View Single Post
Old 11-19-2011, 08:07 AM   #17
Johnny Danger
Registered User
 
Johnny Danger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 4,810
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by cheetah View Post
Even if the 19" weigh less than the 17's, the effective mass (moment of inertia) is much higher. Simply put, the weight is farther from the axis of rotation.

I currently have 18's 225-F / 265-R on my 02 S, and am going back to 17's. The 18's were great until I did all my suspension mods (PSS9's, solid everything, etc.) but now I want a little more sidewall. When it breaks loose, it happens suddenly.

Also, I am getting some lightweight, Forged rims so the wheel weight will go down significantly. Weight reduction is my plan of attack for now, since I have a heavily modded 3.4L which puts out a lot of power already.

The big rims look great but have their downsides.
I disagree with you assertion . Ultimately, it comes to reducing unsprung weight and rotational mass. If the overall circumference is consistent, regardless of diameter the the lighter wheel will create less inertia .
__________________
Don't worry … I've got the microfilm.
Johnny Danger is offline   Reply With Quote