View Single Post
Old 07-21-2010, 08:28 AM   #14
Jake Raby
Engine Surgeon
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Cleveland GA USA
Posts: 2,425
Quote:
Originally Posted by sppmo
Jake thanks for posting a reply. But you do get business from ln engineering whether you want to admit it or not. Charles even has a link to your business.

So if you don't earn any money on the sale of the part/tools you at least indirectly benefit. To say "ZERO vested interest in LN Engineering" is being disingenuous at best. That is just my "Troll" opinion.
LN Engineering has a link to my site because they like to work with us and we provide the most comprehensive installation of their IMS retrofit bearing. When we carry out these procedures they don't have to support us, we never call with questions, because we improvise, adapt and overcome challenges that would stop others with less experience in their tracks.

Like someone else said, even if I did have an investment in LN Engineering what business of yours would that be? NONE.

I believe in teamwork, if Charles and I hadn't teamed up to do this development it probably still wouldn't be applicable today. Porsche would have made at least another 150K from sales of engines that we have been able to save when caught in the middle of an IMS bearing failure.

One last thing:
Quote:
So if you don't earn any money on the sale of the part/tools you at least indirectly benefit
FYI: You'll not find the IMS bearing retrofit components or tools on my site currently. We have not sold the bearings at retail or wholesale since February as our focus has been on the PROCEDURE and carrying those procedures out here at our facility along with fully updated engine builds. We could no longer support retail sales and support and I closed my store while we focused on our specialty. It is still closed today and we are not selling individual bearings or tools.

So currently and for the past 5 months we have not "earned any money from the parts/tools" as you reference. If you are going to make statements, please educate yourself before you make them.
__________________
Jake Raby/www.flat6innovations.com
IMS Solution/ Faultless Tool Inventor
US Patent 8,992,089 &
US Patent 9,416,697
Developer of The IMS Retrofit Procedure- M96/ M97 Specialist

Last edited by Jake Raby; 07-21-2010 at 08:35 AM.
Jake Raby is offline   Reply With Quote