986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners - View Single Post

Jake Raby · 07-27-2009, 10:22 PM

None of the data has been posted, and it probably won't be... As soon as I mentioned it arguments began and thats something that I simply do not have time for these days.... Plus lots of people are rating the exhaust systems on sound and weight, and all I care about is RPM range and net power, especially torque..

I continue to gather data, I just finshed this testing today... 3 engines, same car.

All started life as a 3.2, the control is the lowest output run.. The 247HP run is a stock 3.2 bottom end with a nice valve job, bump in CR and cam timing alteration... Its got A LOT more left in it, it still had the 3.6 flash in the ECU in these tests..

The 286HP run was a stage II 3.6 that started life as the bone stock 3.2 that made the lowest power on this graph (it was hurting)...

07-27-2009, 10:22 PM	#3
Jake Raby Engine Surgeon Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Cleveland GA USA Posts: 2,425	None of the data has been posted, and it probably won't be... As soon as I mentioned it arguments began and thats something that I simply do not have time for these days.... Plus lots of people are rating the exhaust systems on sound and weight, and all I care about is RPM range and net power, especially torque.. I continue to gather data, I just finshed this testing today... 3 engines, same car. All started life as a 3.2, the control is the lowest output run.. The 247HP run is a stock 3.2 bottom end with a nice valve job, bump in CR and cam timing alteration... Its got A LOT more left in it, it still had the 3.6 flash in the ECU in these tests.. The 286HP run was a stage II 3.6 that started life as the bone stock 3.2 that made the lowest power on this graph (it was hurting)... Last edited by Jake Raby; 07-27-2009 at 11:04 PM.