View Single Post
Old 05-19-2008, 06:00 AM   #7
skip_168
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: florida
Posts: 111
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brucelee
......................
The SM told me that apparently the factory thought it was cheaper to replace than to reengineer the engine.

Go figure?

this is kind of my point.. you know, if it was a major design flaw, and 75% of the engines out there were doomed to failure, they would redesign, cause it would be cheaper to.. if the failure rate was low enough, they would just replace engines.. makes sense to me...

the part that sucks for the customer is The factory has a time limit to its liability.. then its the owners problem....
__________________

skip_168 is offline   Reply With Quote