Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Adam
Oh, ok I thought he was talking about the new SLK. my mistake. You are going to eat your foot later when someone else can varify these #'s. Why would I risk looking stupid and like a liar and make #'s up? R&T did a 13.4sec 1/4 mile rip in the latest issue with a 987S and C&D did a 13.6 sec rip. How bout you do alittle research for yourself and go out and spend 4 bucks like I did. Then come back here and call me a "dreamer" or liar or whatever it was. I wont hold my breath newb. Maybe next time YOU should do some research before jumping on someone(before your 5th post no less). Does no one read up on cars in the car mags anymore? Anyone out there read R&T? You may be able to beat 2.5 and 2.7L boxsters, but the 986 S can do 13.7's-13.8's and will walk S2K's all day long...sorry. One more thing kinda off topic....is anyone else having a really hard time reading the posts? I have dark blue letters on a dark grey background and it is absolutely horrible to try to read.
|
Here's the numbers for the SLK
http://www.dragtimes.com/Mercedes-Benz-SLK55-AMG-Timeslip-5170.html
Let's see the numbers for the Boxster.