My 986 is more than 10 years old and it has NOT had an IMS failure yet. It seems to me I have two practical choices:
- object to the settlement and hope the court decides in December the settlement isn't fair
- opt out of settlement and preserve my right to seek damages for a future IMS failure
The third choice - accept the settlement - would guarantee that I would not receive anything for a future IMS failure because of the 10 year rule.
Do other agree that I am interpertng the settlement right? If so, I will probably opt out.
Threaded Mode
