986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners

986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners (http://986forum.com/forums/index.php)
-   Performance and Technical Chat (http://986forum.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=11)
-   -   How can a 911 3.4 have so much more HP than a 3.2 Boxster S? (http://986forum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=49364)

golonaus 11-18-2013 06:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jaykay (Post 372899)
Jaay does the cayman cover mess with the soft top? Were you able to adapt ithe insulation cover to fit over it ?

no problem there
5 min job to remove excess sponge/isolation

jaykay 11-18-2013 06:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jake Raby (Post 372037)
That 2.7 intake is killing the potential of that engine. The 2.7 intake is inadequate even for a 2.7 engine.

The 3.2 plenums look to be the same size as the 2.7s. They look to be an even smaller volume than the 2.5s....squashed down. The 3.4 plenums look voluminous by comparison...going by pictures. The entrance into the 3.4 plenums are larger too

One has to wonder what the 3.4s would do atop a 3.2

jaykay 11-18-2013 06:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Radium King (Post 371675)
that would be the ultimate intake conversion then ...

987 air box - $250 used
987 engine cover - $100 used
996 3.4 intake manifold - $250 used
997 plenum - $50 new (you could use the 996 plenum, but one assumes the 997 part is an improvement)
996/997/987 throttle body - $100 used
987 maf housing - $100 jobber

$850.

get a softronic tune that let's you use a 987 maf housing - $700 on sale (or $50 labour at your local indy if a 996 3.4 x51 row pre-variocam+ tune will work).

finally, a $500 performance exhaust (topspeed or 987 S take-off) and a $200 underdrive pulley.

so, potentially 300 hp bolt-on (+50) for $1,600 to $2,250 - worth it?

I tried to get softronic to give me a cayman MAF housing tune to no avail.

itsnotanova 11-19-2016 05:18 AM

Bump on this thread. I just switched motors back from a 3.4 to a 3.2 and I don't notice any real difference in power. I have a 3.4 intake, 987 air box,4 inch pulley, 996 ROW tune, headers and custom made exhaust. I question why Porsche even bothered with building a 3.4.

The Radium King 11-19-2016 07:13 AM

that is what i am running (except the 996 intake manifold - i just have the 997 plenum) and the full top speed catless exhaust. i found that the 996 tune really opened up the car. i can run with 987.1 caymans on the straights now. how was the fit for the 996 intake manifold - you had to tap the head and add additional bosses yes? i would expect the longer runners would add some torque.

Gelbster 11-19-2016 08:56 AM

There is an inexpensive (996-style)upgraded intake mod available. Search Ben006 on this Forum
http://986forum.com/forums/diy-project-guides/55966-intake-plenum-911-throttle-body-post516908.html#post516908

jaykay 12-17-2016 08:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Radium King (Post 517058)
that is what i am running (except the 996 intake manifold - i just have the 997 plenum) and the full top speed catless exhaust. i found that the 996 tune really opened up the car. i can run with 987.1 caymans on the straights now. how was the fit for the 996 plenum - you had to tap the head and add additional bosses yes? i would expect the longer runners would add some torque.

How's your low end torque with this set up?

The Radium King 12-17-2016 09:24 AM

i won't make any quantifiable claims given the following caveats:

- i have no dyno results.
- my changes are done in batches (ie, new tune was done with new exhaust, new intake was done with udp, etc.) so i can't comment on how i can attribute improvements to one specific change or another.
- new exhaust is lighter, so is the benefit in power or weight reduction?
- my changes get done in the winter, with track and maintenance work in the summer, so i cant really provide 'back to back' comparison.
- the butt dyno is an inaccurate thing, easily fooled by engine sound, change in throttle curve, etc.

regardless, first and second gear now feel much more powerful when just hooning around on the street. power gets down harder on turn out (had to relearn a few things ...) and i was hanging with an instructor in a 987.1 cayman running r7s (i was on nt01s) so am happy with the results. i was tracking my trims before/after the change (the 996 tune allows me to run a cayman maf holder with my cayman airbox and removes the last restriction in my intake with 997 plenum and 74 mm throttlebody) and everything trimmed out well within specs (idle trims were naturally a bit higher but low load was fine). butt dyno says that the 996 tune brought back some torque. aside: this may make sense, as the 996 appears to be set up for more torque than the 986 - intake runners are longer, and the rear engine layout is better disposed to getting the power down earlier.

otherwise, the full sino-exhaust without any cats is an earful but DOES mellow over time. fit and finish was satisfactory and a black ceramic finish does reduce temps (and looks mean). the cacaphony is added to by the fact that i removed all the insulation where the roof sits (and remove the two engine carpets when at the track). not so much louder but more mechanical clicks and clacks from the engine. made even more noticeable by rennline transmission mounts. shifting DRAMATICALLY improved with the mid-level rubbers (didn't expect it, but noticably better engagement on an otherwise stock shifter, cables, etc,) and only minor increase in noise/vibration. i have some function first inserts for the engine mount as well, so we will see if stiffer engine and transmission mounts are too much in combination. regardless, the whole setup is still very streetable, even with the coilovers on full stiff - i've found that i can run my stiff suspension on the street if i use 17" wheels (the taller sidewall adds some play to the whole setup).

final steps - thinking 996 intake runners. there should be enough headroom with the 987 engine cover, but don't really want to tap the heads, and would have to figure out how to deal with the fuel rails.

jaykay 12-29-2016 09:42 PM

Nice, summary TRK.....you know I had not thought about about trans. mounts at all. Thanks for the tip. I don't want to increase noise and vibration though...

Gilles 12-30-2016 08:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jaykay (Post 521059)
Nice, summary TRK.....you know I had not thought about about trans. mounts at all. Thanks for the tip. I don't want to increase noise and vibration though...

Jaykay, another downside of using stiffer engine and transmission mounts is the possibility that the knock sensor may read the vibration as detonation, therefore will be retarding the timing...

The Radium King 12-30-2016 09:12 AM

i've read that, but never on a m96. i can't say that i've ever experienced that, but can log timing next year to see.

jaykay 12-30-2016 10:02 AM

The Rennline ones are pricey wow! They give you the ability to soften and adjust if needed. It looks like there are various inserts with differing hysteresis characteristics.

Not sure how one would adjust once they are in there without a lot of work

steved0x 12-30-2016 02:36 PM

I've got the Wevo trans mounts combined with OEM engine mount. Very nice, the trans mounts add a little bit of vibration at idle, like a massager, but I didn't notice any additional NVH outside of that.

The Radium King 12-30-2016 06:56 PM

well, since we are amongst friends, here is 7 seconds of full catless che exhaust, semi-solid transmission mounts, all rear insulation deleted, and no rear carpets. followed by 7 seconds of a set of nitto nt01's exceeding their slip angle ...

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/bgJrs265HyA" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

jaykay 01-01-2017 04:31 PM

Nice Bro.......!

steved0x 01-01-2017 05:13 PM

Yikes, those walls!

BoxsterSteve 01-01-2017 05:46 PM

I clenched a bit when I saw the wall get close...

The Radium King 01-01-2017 05:47 PM

yeah, now i know why people dub in bad techno music over their track videos - so you can't hear all the idiot things they do with their throttle. with -insert preferred diety here- as my witness, i figured i could steer out of that, so got on the throttle anyways. yeah, those walls. regardless, i got luckier than this guy ...

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/nvnAVN2qcos?rel=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

steved0x 01-01-2017 07:02 PM

Both feet in mother %&*$#@ and keep them there. That's what I used to say until I had a spin where I went both feet in hard and the abs came on and let me roll backwards across the track just like that even though I was mashing the brake as hard as I could. However it looked like the corvette just released the brakes and rolled back... It is a peeve of mine...

jaykay 01-01-2017 07:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by itsnotanova (Post 517050)
Bump on this thread. I just switched motors back from a 3.4 to a 3.2 and I don't notice any real difference in power. I have a 3.4 intake, 987 air box,4 inch pulley, 996 ROW tune, headers and custom made exhaust. I question why Porsche even bothered with building a 3.4.

Wood,

Have you considered the Cayman intake plenums rather than 996s?

Anker 01-02-2017 06:49 AM

The guy who spun out should have hit the brakes instead of letting it roll backwards across the track. The Miata didn't have anywhere to go.

The Radium King 01-02-2017 09:17 AM

things happen on the track. ultimately it was up to the miata not to hit the vette. there was room to stop. he made a call, it didn't work out, no one was hurt. i understand his call - i decided not to stop too - the corner into that mess is fast, and peaked like a road so that the outside is off-camber - it would have been a bit of a cluster if cars started stacking-up in there. first thing i was ever taught at the track - "drive as fast as you can afford".

anyway, sorry for thread hijack. GF says my car sounds like a cartoon car - if a kid could make a race car, that's what it would sound like. not sure if that was meant as praise, but i'll take it. very happy with the 996 tune.

jaykay 01-03-2017 08:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by steved0x (Post 521349)
Both feet in mother %&*$#@ and keep them there. That's what I used to say until I had a spin where I went both feet in hard and the abs came on and let me roll backwards across the track just like that even though I was mashing the brake as hard as I could. However it looked like the corvette just released the brakes and rolled back... It is a peeve of mine...

I have not experienced this....so ABS active roll backwards? Yikes! Do you drop the clutch nowadays? In my younger days I have had big ABS cut out switches on my car such that I could shut it down if it started to get me in trouble

I am thinking I have never had this as in all my spins I have managed to use brakes to keep a fairly straight and keep forward momentum once things have snapped around.....been a while though for me. This excludes my Jeep on 401 black ice event;)

steved0x 01-03-2017 09:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jaykay (Post 521488)
I have not experienced this....so ABS active roll backwards? Yikes! Do you drop the clutch nowadays?

Yes, here:

https://youtu.be/ex41Q8B_w8o

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/ex41Q8B_w8o" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

As soon as it goes and I know I'm not going to recover I got both feet in, clutch and brake. And I am hard on the brake. Watch the car leisurely [edit: watching it again it is not so leisurely, it is really rolling fast] roll back across the track, inside the car I can hear (and feel) the ABS clicking like mad. I guess I should have let off and reapplied the brakes? Also I have added a new step to "In for a spin, both feet in" and that is to center the wheel so I don't curve back around across the track if my braking is unsuccessful.

Porsche9 01-03-2017 12:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by steved0x (Post 521492)
Yes, here:

https://youtu.be/ex41Q8B_w8o

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/ex41Q8B_w8o" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

As soon as it goes and I know I'm not going to recover I got both feet in, clutch and brake. And I am hard on the brake. Watch the car leisurely [edit: watching it again it is not so leisurely, it is really rolling fast] roll back across the track, inside the car I can hear (and feel) the ABS clicking like mad. I guess I should have let off and reapplied the brakes? Also I have added a new step to "In for a spin, both feet in" and that is to center the wheel so I don't curve back around across the track if my braking is unsuccessful.

Would applying the handbrake as you come close to being stopped prevent rolling back?

steved0x 01-03-2017 12:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Porsche9 (Post 521516)
Would applying the handbrake as you come close to being stopped prevent rolling back?

Maybe but I doubt I could successfully pull that off... I think pulsing the brake pedal once to maybe "reset" the ABS when the car switched from rolling forwards to rolling backwards would probably work better. Although it all happens so fast...

Porsche9 01-03-2017 01:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by steved0x (Post 521518)
Maybe but I doubt I could successfully pull that off... I think pulsing the brake pedal once to maybe "reset" the ABS when the car switched from rolling forwards to rolling backwards would probably work better. Although it all happens so fast...

It does happen fast that's for sure. With the Miata running into the Corvette I was watching and thinking "pull the hand brake" but when you are in the situation and the world spinning it not always easy to think clearly and react accordingly. It usually has to be practiced and almost automatic.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:31 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website