986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners

986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners (http://986forum.com/forums/index.php)
-   Performance and Technical Chat (http://986forum.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=11)
-   -   LS7 Boxster? That's what they told me... (http://986forum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=36644)

986_inquiry 08-03-2012 04:12 PM

LS7 Boxster? That's what they told me...
 
Got this email today. 500hp NA Boxster? Yes please.
Quote:

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Info <info@renegadehybrids.com>
Date: Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 6:15 PM
Subject: Re: Boxster 986 with blown engine, do you guys have LS conversions?

Thanks for asking. We are working on it. Our car is running and driving with an LS7, but the rear transaxle mount design was not quite up to our standards. We generally over-build most of our parts so big HP can be used without upgrades. This is why the LS7 was chosen for the first Boxster.

Our newest mounts are designed and some prototype parts will be back from the laser cutter later next week. We are still weeks or maybe a few months, but we are making serious progress.

I will tell you, just driving the 'tester' around the block is quite a thrill!

I will put you on the email list and keep you posted. Thanks again for asking!

Sincerely,
Scott >>> Renegade Hybrids
Renegade Hybrids
(866) 498-2421 toll free

Note: If you reply, please include all previous e-mails so that I don't lose the context. Thank you!

RandallNeighbour 08-03-2012 04:14 PM

Not a Boxster though. Only a Boxster S. I'm in regular contact with these guys. No kit for a lowly 97 or 98 base model like ours.

986_inquiry 08-03-2012 04:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RandallNeighbour (Post 300260)
Not a Boxster though. Only a Boxster S. I'm in regular contact with these guys. No kit for a lowly 97 or 98 base model like ours.

sorry should have included the entire email:

Quote:



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Info <info@renegadehybrids.com>
Date: Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 6:15 PM
Subject: Re: Boxster 986 with blown engine, do you guys have LS conversions?



Thanks for asking. We are working on it. Our car is running and driving with an LS7, but the rear transaxle mount design was not quite up to our standards. We generally over-build most of our parts so big HP can be used without upgrades. This is why the LS7 was chosen for the first Boxster.

Our newest mounts are designed and some prototype parts will be back from the laser cutter later next week. We are still weeks or maybe a few months, but we are making serious progress.

I will tell you, just driving the 'tester' around the block is quite a thrill!

I will put you on the email list and keep you posted. Thanks again for asking!

Sincerely,
Scott >>> Renegade Hybrids
Renegade Hybrids
(866) 498-2421 toll free

Note: If you reply, please include all previous e-mails so that I don't lose the context. Thank you!

----- Original Message -----
To: <info@renegadehybrids.com>
Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2012 10:30 PM
Subject: Boxster 986 with blown engine, do you guys have LS conversions?



> I have a 986 Boxster with a blown engine. Could go back to 200hp, but
> I'm looking around, keeping my options open.
>
> read you guys were working on a 986 LS build, how's that going?
> http://986forum.com/forums/performance-technical-chat/23284-ls1-boxster.html
>
>


RandallNeighbour 08-03-2012 05:46 PM

Have they told you they will create a kit for a base Boxster? They have communicated with me within the last two months reiterating they need an S's 3rd radiator and bigger brakes for the conversion, although I think the base brakes are fine and the 3rd radiator can be added...

blue2000s 08-03-2012 05:50 PM

I know it's completely anecdotal, but I've seen more Corvettes and Vipers off into the weeds at the track than any other car. I think these big torqey engines without yaw control can make it very easy to overload the car's traction.

A Boxster with over 400 lb-ft of torque would take either a very patient or very talented driver.

I'd be interested to hear from the guys who track more regularly than I do about this but in my experience, there's a trend.

JAAY 08-03-2012 06:07 PM

Hmm. Anyone wanna buy a 3.4 conversion? :) JK I would really have to see the finished product before diving into that. Besides, I only own metric tools. What the hell would I do with a LS motor, I have no clue how to work on it. :dance:

RandallNeighbour 08-03-2012 07:01 PM

That's the beauty of an LS series motor. You don't have to work on it. The design has been refined over many years and the motors are near-bullet proof.

Plus, the oil changes are cheap!

Crono0001 08-03-2012 09:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blue2000s (Post 300273)
I know it's completely anecdotal, but I've seen more Corvettes and Vipers off into the weeds at the track than any other car. I think these big torqey engines without yaw control can make it very easy to overload the car's traction.

That's cause American cars are built for the straights. That would never happen in a GT-R

Crono0001 08-03-2012 09:14 PM

Boxster S vs Elise vs S2000 Touge Test & Track Battle - Best Motoring International - YouTube

Good driving in this video too. He also talks about how... bad... American cars are

Ghostrider 310 08-04-2012 02:57 AM

From Video: "I like the feel of the S 2000, especially through my dandelion picking / fish scaling gloves" or maybe that was just my thoughts... I have a pair from Italy I never wear that are like putting on another skin.

Topless 08-04-2012 02:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RandallNeighbour (Post 300281)
That's the beauty of an LS series motor. You don't have to work on it. The design has been refined over many years and the motors are near-bullet proof.

Plus, the oil changes are cheap!

Bingo! The Chevy LS motor is as bulletproof as it gets. Scott and I are friends and share some of the leadership duties in PCA Zone 8. If he says it's not quite ready... it's not ready. To put one of these motors in a base Boxster I would want S cooling with 3rd rad and larger diameter plumbing, S brakes, and "S" 6spd trans with LSD. The 5spd is not ready for this kind of torque and would overheat and grenade in short order IMHO. Find a nice "S" roller and have at it.

RE: "putting it in the weeds"
Any car with over 400hp is pretty easy to put in the weeds and requires patience and talent. The king is the tail-happy Viper but Vettes and GT3s certainly get their share of Ag time. :)

stephen wilson 08-04-2012 03:40 PM

It's not just the engine power, the Corvette suspension package is notoriously unforgiving at the limit. Also, many LS iterations have oil control/pressure problems when tracked.

MikenOH 08-08-2012 04:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Topless (Post 300345)
Bingo! The Chevy LS motor is as bulletproof as it gets. Scott and I are friends and share some of the leadership duties in PCA Zone 8. If he says it's not quite ready... it's not ready. To put one of these motors in a base Boxster I would want S cooling with 3rd rad and larger diameter plumbing, S brakes, and "S" 6spd trans with LSD. The 5spd is not ready for this kind of torque and would overheat and grenade in short order IMHO. Find a nice "S" roller and have at it.

RE: "putting it in the weeds"
Any car with over 400hp is pretty easy to put in the weeds and requires patience and talent. The king is the tail-happy Viper but Vettes and GT3s certainly get their share of Ag time. :)


Topless:
So the LS series motor will fit within the confines of the 986 engine compartment? Any major mods required to get it in?

Besides the tranny and cooling, any other major issues?

A while back somebody posted about the 4.2L audi v8 as an alternative; plenty of HP but less torque than an LS series.

grubinski 08-08-2012 05:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MikenOH (Post 300720)
A while back somebody posted about the 4.2L audi v8 as an alternative; plenty of HP but less torque than an LS series.

One reason the LS motors will fit where others won't is the relatively small heads. An Audi V8 with DOHC cylinder heads might well be heavier and certainly would be larger and harder to fit in the engine bay. Even though the LS "only" has pushrods, the redline is within ~500 rpm of my '00 S engine ... and the car would probably be faster even shifting at 3500. The only downsides I can see to the LS motor are that the CG of the motor would be higher, and it wouldn't make those sexy flat 6 noises.

Topless 08-08-2012 06:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MikenOH (Post 300720)
Topless:
So the LS series motor will fit within the confines of the 986 engine compartment? Any major mods required to get it in?

Besides the tranny and cooling, any other major issues?

Oh yes! Scott is in the final stages of development on this. He already has an LS powered 996 which had an m96 motor also. The major issues of cooling, motor mounts, trans adapter, electronics are sorted. The devil is in the little details that separate a "project car" from a bulletproof everyday driver. It is close and he has a drivable LS Boxster prototype now. The V8 actually weighs less than my 2.5L. :)

landrovered 08-08-2012 07:22 AM

hmmm.........

The Radium King 08-08-2012 07:57 AM

looking at the 996 install it seems pretty involved. we're not just talking motor mount and transmission adaptors. it looks like most of the ancilliaries are pulled of the ls motor to make it fit - kit requires remote-mounted electric water pump and power steering. it's $7k just for the parts. add a strong motor and you are pushing twice that.

BYprodriver 08-08-2012 08:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blue2000s (Post 300273)
I know it's completely anecdotal, but I've seen more Corvettes and Vipers off into the weeds at the track than any other car. I think these big torqey engines without yaw control can make it very easy to overload the car's traction.

A Boxster with over 400 lb-ft of torque would take either a very patient or very talented driver.

I'd be interested to hear from the guys who track more regularly than I do about this but in my experience, there's a trend.

I have driven ZO6 & Vipers and they do indeed have the torque to break the rear tires loose just about anytime the steering wheel is turned. Of course the front engine placement doesn't help.

kcpaz 08-08-2012 08:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Radium King (Post 300764)
looking at the 996 install it seems pretty involved. we're not just talking motor mount and transmission adaptors. it looks like most of the ancilliaries are pulled of the ls motor to make it fit - kit requires remote-mounted electric water pump and power steering. it's $7k just for the parts. add a strong motor and you are pushing twice that.

This is true with EVERY cross-manufacture engine conversion. Physically mounting the engine is the easiest part. Making it function seamlessly is what takes most of the time and money. I always tell people that engine conversions should only be considered by people who intend to keep their car for the long term. Otherwise, the return on the financial investment will never be seen.

As far as an V8 in a Boxster, I think it is going to be a hard sell (for a few reasons), especially when it requires a 6 speed conversion (even more money invested). I think if you are making a conversion kit that can not easily be installed into the early 2.5 cars, you are seriously limiting your market considering those are the most affordable, and most likely cars to be used for conversions.

BYprodriver 08-08-2012 08:46 AM

[QUOTE=Topless;300345]Bingo! The Chevy LS motor is as bulletproof as it gets. Scott and I are friends and share some of the leadership duties in PCA Zone 8. If he says it's not quite ready... it's not ready. To put one of these motors in a base Boxster I would want S cooling with 3rd rad and larger diameter plumbing, S brakes, and "S" 6spd trans with LSD. The 5spd is not ready for this kind of torque and would overheat and grenade in short order IMHO. Find a nice "S" roller and have at it.

More likely a Turbo/Gt3 6-speed if you follow Porsche's upgrade philosophy.

Topless 08-08-2012 09:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcpaz (Post 300770)
This is true with EVERY cross-manufacture engine conversion. Physically mounting the engine is the easiest part. Making it function seamlessly is what takes most of the time and money. I always tell people that engine conversions should only be considered by people who intend to keep their car for the long term. Otherwise, the return on the financial investment will never be seen.

As far as an V8 in a Boxster, I think it is going to be a hard sell (for a few reasons), especially when it requires a 6 speed conversion (even more money invested). I think if you are making a conversion kit that can not easily be installed into the early 2.5 cars, you are seriously limiting your market considering those are the most affordable, and most likely cars to be used for conversions.

Kcpaz, wise words.
You have already walked down the cross platform conversion path so you know first hand that it is a LOT more complicated than it looks. 1000 little details that make you nuts. It is doable though and I expect Scott will be ready by the end of the year on this.

thstone 08-08-2012 11:28 AM

I would worry about the Boxster S transmission handling 450hp+ on a long term basis. A better choice would be a 996 Turbo transmission. Hey, no one said this was going to be easy.

kcpaz 08-08-2012 03:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thstone (Post 300811)
I would worry about the Boxster S transmission handling 450hp+ on a long term basis. A better choice would be a 996 Turbo transmission. Hey, no one said this was going to be easy.

But you have to ask yourself, why on earth do you need a Boxster that makes more than 450hp? These cars are not meant for drag racing. I can tell you from experience that 400 whp through a Boxster S G86/20 transaxle is very reliable and I will be raising the power soon to see what it can take.

The biggest problem I have with the V8 idea is the low end torque. THIS is what will kill the transaxle more than horsepower. That and driving style... which I think goes hand-in-hand with people who want V8's in their light weight, mid-engine Porsches (broad generalization I know)

I've already proved that the Subaru combination is reliable on a track car, and we are currently working on two street car conversions to prove that the concept works with all of the creature comforts like A/C, a full interior, mechanical power steering, and an air/water intercooler set-up that doesn't require the ridiculous roof scoop.

Ghostrider 310 08-09-2012 08:54 AM

I have to laugh Kpaz, you ask him why he needs that kind of rear wheel HP then go onto to say you plan on putting more than 400 on your own car.

stephen wilson 08-09-2012 09:23 AM

I noticed that also!

I think the desire for big power is one of those areas where " if you have to ask, you'll never understand".

lsseven 09-21-2012 09:47 AM

LS7 V8 Boxster 1st Test Drive - YouTube

lsseven 11-15-2012 06:57 PM

LS V8 Boxster Conversion From Renegade Hybrids! - YouTube

evomind 11-01-2013 09:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crono0001 (Post 300288)
That's cause American cars are built for the straights. That would never happen in a GT-R

Time to get out of the 90s.....

Dlirium 11-02-2013 08:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by evomind (Post 370324)
Time to get out of the 90s.....

Indeed. I've actually taken a ride with Scott in this very car. It's got the LS-2 making about 400 hp. Well short of what you can do with an LS-7. Believe me, it was AMAZING! If I wasn't in CA, i'd be doing this in a heartbeat. It's about $5k for the complete conversion kit plus whatever LS crate motor you want to put in there (figure a nice LS-3 making 485 HP is about $15k).

You get all the benefits of a beautifully handling car, with the power to make it competitive at a very high level on track days. The weight difference is nominal, so it's like just adding pure power to your Boxster S.

Here is the latest video, btw:

Renegade V8 Boxster S Review - YouTube

RichInCanada 04-17-2016 03:36 PM

I know this is an OLD thread, but any updates or additional info ?
I asked Scott @ Renegade about a 987 kit, and while he said it should work, has anybody done a 987 ?
I am basing my purchase of a Boxster on this LS swap, I prefer the 987, but ???

Smallblock454 04-18-2016 01:51 AM

Hi RichInCanada,

no detailed infos about a 987 Renegade v8 conversion, but i would recommend this thread about a 986 Renegade v8 conversion: http://986forum.com/forums/show-tell-gallery/54328-boxsterls376-introduction-ls3-conversion.html

Regards, Markus

RichInCanada 04-19-2016 06:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Smallblock454 (Post 492113)
Hi RichInCanada,

no detailed infos about a 987 Renegade v8 conversion, but i would recommend this thread about a 986 Renegade v8 conversion: http://986forum.com/forums/show-tell-gallery/54328-boxsterls376-introduction-ls3-conversion.html

Regards, Markus

Thanks man, informative read, sounds like he'd be the guy to do it !
Just wonder if a 987 is do-able, maybe I'll PM him...


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:43 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website