Go Back   986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners > Porsche Boxster & Cayman Forums > Performance and Technical Chat

View Poll Results: Has your Boxster sustained a IMS failure, requiring engine replacement?
No:1997-1999 MY 16 25.00%
Yes:1997-1999 MY 2 3.13%
Yes-multiple failures: 1997-1999 MY 0 0%
No: 2000-2004 MY 43 67.19%
Yes: 2000-20004 MY 4 6.25%
Yes-multiple failures: 2000-2004 MY 0 0%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 64. You may not vote on this poll

Post Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-28-2010, 10:15 AM   #1
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: NY
Posts: 130
Very true- and nowadays everything seems to be a depreciating asset
dennis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2010, 10:34 AM   #2
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Milford, Ks.
Posts: 73
IMS got me too

I had an IMS bearing failure a little while back but was able to catch it early enough to simply replace the bearing. With a lot of help from Don at EBS and a little mechanical know how I re-timed my cams myself. It seems to be a lot easier to re-time a 3 chain engine versus a five chain, but as far as the removal of all 3 timing chain tensioners (not counting the one inside each valve cover) I was only able to remove 2 on the bottom of the engine. I believe that the 3rd sits snuggly under the A/C compressor from the pictures of an engine that Don had sent to me. I did all that I could short of depressurize the entire system to get to it before I gave up. I have however had my exhaust cam jump timing on me and I was wondering if anyone knew where I might have gone wrong.
__________________
-Jeff-
"I'm a glutton for punishment when it comes to my boxster"
'03 S/ PSS9/ B&M short throw/ EVOMS intake/ NHP full exhaust w/ headers / Cantrell MS custom tune
boxster_s_boy_34 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2010, 11:41 AM   #3
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: fla
Posts: 8
I need a way to change my answer. I voted no in the poll last year, but my 2004 Special Edition suffered an IMS failure with 20k miles on it this month.

It looks like a scary ratio of the 2004 SE's have had issues.....not good.

Ever consider your modifcations to your Boxster may have contributed to your failure?
porsche666 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2010, 01:11 PM   #4
mts
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 312
Quote:
Originally Posted by porsche666
I need a way to change my answer. I voted no in the poll last year, but my 2004 Special Edition suffered an IMS failure with 20k miles on it this month.

It looks like a scary ratio of the 2004 SE's have had issues.....not good.

Ever consider your modifcations to your Boxster may have contributed to your failure?

What modifications? The only non-factory modification I have is secondary cat-bypass pipes. If you are suggesting cat bypass pipes would be a contributing factor toward an IMS failure I'd say you need to put down the crack pipe. It's bad for your health.
__________________
2004 550 SE #1081 of 1953 (sold)
1997 911 Targa (sold)
mts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2010, 06:12 AM   #5
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: fla
Posts: 8
"What modifications? The only non-factory modification I have is secondary cat-bypass pipes. If you are suggesting cat bypass pipes would be a contributing factor toward an IMS failure I'd say you need to put down the crack pipe. It's bad for your health. "

Now I know why you suffered an IMS failure - cause you are a jerk!!!
porsche666 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2010, 06:19 AM   #6
Registered User
 
Brucelee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 8,083
Behave please, both of you.

__________________
Rich Belloff

Brucelee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2011, 06:20 PM   #7
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 12
I have a 2003, 20100 miles and just did the LN Engineering install. The old IMS bearing was fine, showing no signs of wear. I did the install as a preventative measure.
Good day...
__________________
2003 Boxster Speed Yellow


:dance:
Brew city is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2011, 08:56 AM   #8
Engine Surgeon
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Cleveland GA USA
Posts: 2,425
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brew city
I have a 2003, 20100 miles and just did the LN Engineering install. The old IMS bearing was fine, showing no signs of wear. I did the install as a preventative measure.
Good day...
I have yet to see an extracted bearing that did not have some signs of wear after being disassembled and reviewed.. How deep did you look prior to coming to this conclusion?
__________________
Jake Raby/www.flat6innovations.com
IMS Solution/ Faultless Tool Inventor
US Patent 8,992,089 &
US Patent 9,416,697
Developer of The IMS Retrofit Procedure- M96/ M97 Specialist
Jake Raby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2010, 07:05 AM   #9
mts
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 312
Quote:
Originally Posted by mts
What modifications? The only non-factory modification I have is secondary cat-bypass pipes. If you are suggesting cat bypass pipes would be a contributing factor toward an IMS failure I'd say you need to put down the crack pipe. It's bad for your health.

I thought the fact that I put a smiley face on my original comment would ensure folks knew it was a joke. I guess porsche666 didn't see it that way. I'd hate to think my IMS failed because I'm a jerk.......we'll need to add that one to the pile though along with the oil used, how hard the car was driven, how many miles it has, etc. Beyond a somewhat bad design with a weak sealed bearing by Porsche I supposed it's as good a theory as anything else.

__________________
2004 550 SE #1081 of 1953 (sold)
1997 911 Targa (sold)
mts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2010, 07:45 AM   #10
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: fla
Posts: 8
I have a 140,000 miles and never had a problem. It's all about Karma.
porsche666 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2010, 08:12 AM   #11
Registered User
 
Brucelee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 8,083
Having read thousands of posts on the IMS and having sold any number of Boxsters over the years, my opinion is this:

Clearly Porsche had (or has) a design issue that they did not want to confront.

Sadly, many buyers have had to contend with the consequences of that decision.

Hey, I could be wrong.

__________________
Rich Belloff

Brucelee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2010, 09:09 AM   #12
mts
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 312
Quote:
Originally Posted by porsche666
I have a 140,000 miles and never had a problem. It's all about Karma.

Wow, all these people that have had IMS failures simply have bad Karma. Porsche will be so relieved to know that the design of the bearing had nothing to do with it. This should save Porsche a ton of $$ on warranty and goodwill repairs!
__________________
2004 550 SE #1081 of 1953 (sold)
1997 911 Targa (sold)
mts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2010, 05:16 PM   #13
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Midwest
Posts: 1,746
Quote:
Originally Posted by porsche666
I have a 140,000 miles and never had a problem. It's all about Karma.



Karma, huh? Your other posts certainly seem to ignore it:




" just bought my 1st 986, I am 70 Years old. It is stick shift. Hate it that the steering wheel does not tilt; makes it very hard to get leg (knee) under steering wheel and foot past clutch when getting into the car. Any suggestions?"

porsche666's response:

"Yes..... trade it in on a Cadillac. They have more room for a wheelchair."

Replying to jhandy's question regarding his car dying on the road:

"Aren't you a surgeon in Texas? Surely you can afford to buy a new car?"'t

porsche666's response at the top of this page:

"Now I know why you suffered an IMS failure - cause you are a jerk!!!"



Nice Karma ratio for only 8 posts.
coreseller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2011, 10:05 AM   #14
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: northeast
Posts: 31
Smile

Quote:
Originally Posted by mts View Post
I thought the fact that I put a smiley face on my original comment would ensure folks knew it was a joke. I guess porsche666 didn't see it that way. I'd hate to think my IMS failed because I'm a jerk.......we'll need to add that one to the pile though along with the oil used, how hard the car was driven, how many miles it has, etc. Beyond a somewhat bad design with a weak sealed bearing by Porsche I supposed it's as good a theory as anything else.

thanks for the explain--I thought the failure only happened to people who couldn't afford the "fix"-
danyl55 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2011, 05:42 AM   #15
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 9
IMS & RMS Issues

I have a 2003 Boxster S with 148,000 Kilometers on the clock. It is my daily drive approx 70 Kilometers Monday to Friday. No sign of any unusual noises or oil leaks (and I do listen for them). I plan to replace the IMS Bearing & RMS at 160,000 Kilometers using the ceramic after market bearing as a precaution.
Have had to replace the water pump twice, the bearings on the serpantine belt tensioner & idler wheels. The air oil separator was embarrassing when it let go and I have replaced the clutch pressure plate & driven plate. Oh and the alternatior neeeded a rebuild as well.
I change the oil and filter every 10,000 Kilometers often wonder if the reason that some experience failures is cold climate effects on oil viscosity at startup. I live in a temperate climate where the temperature never gets near freezing.
I look forward to getting into the car every day & do not intend to ever sell it. It is a modern day classic.

Last edited by Tony W; 10-02-2011 at 05:45 AM.
Tony W is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2012, 05:45 PM   #16
Registered User
 
mrjr1000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: SW MO PCA OLK
Posts: 21
Garage
2000 S with 63K miles. Fifth owner. Owned for year and half. Put roughly 10K of those miles on myself.

No major problems. One MAF replacement and routine maintenance.

Drivers side window does not go down the desired distance when opening door but have learned to finish the job by hand.

Finish is still great. Interior leather shows small sign of wear on drivers bolster.

Drives great. Handles superbly. Still plenty of power. Clutch firm.

So firm No from me.
__________________
2000 S
Metallic Black over Boxster Red
6-speed
mrjr1000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2012, 09:10 PM   #17
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: spokane wa
Posts: 5
2004 Boxster, tiptronic, 20,000 miles. No failure!
Boxster Dave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2011, 01:56 AM   #18
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: NY
Posts: 130
Do we have model year for sure, where the IMS has been addressed? Is it safe to say '10 and up are immune? I would seriously consider buying a newer one in a few yr is that is the case
dennis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2011, 04:46 AM   #19
Registered User
 
mallai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: northeast
Posts: 34
Quote:
Originally Posted by porsche666
I need a way to change my answer. I voted no in the poll last year, but my 2004 Special Edition suffered an IMS failure with 20k miles on it this month.

It looks like a scary ratio of the 2004 SE's have had issues.....not good.

Ever consider your modifcations to your Boxster may have contributed to your failure?

After reading through this forum and planning to look at a 2004 S 550 SE in a few days, I'm thinking of scrapping buying a Boxster altogether..I've been elated for several weeks since making the decision to buy one but now totally disheartened..
mallai is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2011, 04:57 AM   #20
mts
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 312
Quote:
Originally Posted by mallai
After reading through this forum and planning to look at a 2004 S 550 SE in a few days, I'm thinking of scrapping buying a Boxster altogether..I've been elated for several weeks since making the decision to buy one but now totally disheartened..

Get the IMS updated and sleep like a baby. It's one heck of a car once that is fixed. I have a friend selling a 550 that has already had the LN Engineering IMS upgrade done. Solid car. PM me if you have any interest and I will get you the contact information.
__________________
2004 550 SE #1081 of 1953 (sold)
1997 911 Targa (sold)
mts is offline   Reply With Quote
Post Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:49 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page