Go Back   986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners > Porsche Boxster & Cayman Forums > Boxster Racing Forum

Post Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-11-2019, 04:24 PM   #1
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 40
Opinions Re Data Systems

Does anyone mind sharing opinions regarding the current data system options? I believe most people use an AIM product in Spec Boxster racing but am not sure if this is true and, if so, which one(s). I would like to be able to share / exchange data with others. Also, I have heard that the ECU in the 97-99 Boxsters do not provide much information, so additional sensors are necessary. Does anyone have thoughts on which sensors are the most important.

Thanks in advance and I apologize if this has been covered before. I did not find much recent information in my search.
JEDD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2019, 03:09 AM   #2
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: NYC
Posts: 3
I use the Racelogic VBox HD2 in a 99 SPB and love it. I have a microinput module set up to get throttle, steering angle and brake pressure (estimated using brake light signal and longitudinal G). I think it is the best system all around, but not too many people use the system in SPB, at least not here on the East Coast.
MJP911 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2019, 06:49 AM   #3
Registered User
 
Lemming's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: B'ham, AL
Posts: 267
Racelogic VBOX lite, fantastic unit, easy to use, less expensive than the HD. Video quality is not that of the HD, but I'm more interested in the data that showing nice vids and price point was a factor for me. I also have the microinput module and can get all the data that I'm really interested in easily.
__________________
Tim
1998 986 (3.2L and 6-speed transmission added)
1999 986 (SPB)
1999 986 (parts car)
2001 986 S (parts car)
Lemming is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2019, 03:57 PM   #4
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 40
Quote:
Originally Posted by MJP911 View Post
I use the Racelogic VBox HD2 in a 99 SPB and love it. I have a microinput module set up to get throttle, steering angle and brake pressure (estimated using brake light signal and longitudinal G). I think it is the best system all around, but not too many people use the system in SPB, at least not here on the East Coast.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lemming View Post
Racelogic VBOX lite, fantastic unit, easy to use, less expensive than the HD. Video quality is not that of the HD, but I'm more interested in the data that showing nice vids and price point was a factor for me. I also have the microinput module and can get all the data that I'm really interested in easily.
Great information. Thank you very much!
JEDD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2019, 11:09 AM   #5
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: SLC
Posts: 209
JEDD,

What are your primary goals for a data system. Are you after great videos, driver development, chassis development or just monitoring your car vitals. How much $$$ are you willing to lay out.

AIM is popular because it offers many of the features of Pro systems (Motec, Pi/Cosworth, Bosch, etc.) at significantly lower cost. The VBOX systems have significantly better video capture and functionality than AIM.

There are pro's and con's to them all.

The K-line output from the Boxster ECU is far too slow to really capture meaningful data. It has many of the right channels. TPS for instance would not even remotely show you accurately where you were full throttle on corner exit. That why additional sensors are the way to go, or taping the signal from the TPS in this case.
__________________
PCA Intermountain Region Track Chair
SPB #50
MaxD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2019, 11:43 AM   #6
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 40
Quote:
Originally Posted by MaxD View Post
JEDD,

What are your primary goals for a data system. Are you after great videos, driver development, chassis development or just monitoring your car vitals. How much $$$ are you willing to lay out.

AIM is popular because it offers many of the features of Pro systems (Motec, Pi/Cosworth, Bosch, etc.) at significantly lower cost. The VBOX systems have significantly better video capture and functionality than AIM.

There are pro's and con's to them all.

The K-line output from the Boxster ECU is far too slow to really capture meaningful data. It has many of the right channels. TPS for instance would not even remotely show you accurately where you were full throttle on corner exit. That why additional sensors are the way to go, or taping the signal from the TPS in this case.
Thanks Max and great information! I'll do some more research on those options.

My highest priority is driver development, then chassis development, vitals and video quality.

I don't want to spend too much, but I also don't want to throw good money into a system that doesn't advance my goals. Does this change anything in your opinion?
JEDD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2019, 04:05 AM   #7
Registered User
 
jsceash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,466
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by MaxD View Post
JEDD,

AIM is popular because it offers many of the features of Pro systems (Motec, Pi/Cosworth, Bosch, etc.) at significantly lower cost. The VBOX systems have significantly better video capture and functionality than AIM.

There are pro's and con's to them all.

The K-line output from the Boxster ECU is far too slow to really capture meaningful data. It has many of the right channels. TPS for instance would not even remotely show you accurately where you were full throttle on corner exit. That why additional sensors are the way to go, or taping the signal from the TPS in this case.
My experience with Aim is this exact thing. My speedometer show one thing on track and on replay is often 5 MPH lower Tack is similar. So you never see your peek speed on video. and my gas pedal was often 40 to 60 % when I know it was matted.
__________________
2003 Black 986. modified for Advanced level HPDE and open track days.
* 3.6L LN block, 06 heads, Carrillo H rods, IDP with 987 intake, Oil mods, LN IMS. * Spec II Clutch, 3.2L S Spec P-P FW. * D2 shocks, GT3 arms & and links, Spacers front and rear * Weight reduced, No carpet, AC deleted, Remote PS pump, PS pump deleted. Recaro Pole position seats, Brey crouse ext. 5 point harness, NHP sport exhaust
jsceash is offline   Reply With Quote
Post Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page