11-27-2006, 03:25 PM
|
#1
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 530
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Sammy
Regarding the Shelby, I don't believe that 2 seconds is close when you have the top three cars all within 0.5 seconds of each other. Even if the engine was running properly, the time made up in the straights would be minor compared to what it loses in the corners.
BTW - I thought it was a great article and hopefully they will keep using this comparison in the future. 
|
FWIW, the time diff was 1.5 seconds, not 2. And it's a huge assumption backed up by no facts that "the time made up in the straights would be minor" if the Shelby weren't sick. We just don't know.
Finally, my whole point was that this thread smacks of snobbery against anything not Porsche. The Shelby was being dismissed because it is a Ford, and that's a mistake. Look at what won the shootout. A Ford GT.
__________________
Jack
2000 Boxster S - gone -
2006 Audi A6 Quattro 3.2
|
|
|
11-27-2006, 03:55 PM
|
#2
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Northeast USA
Posts: 910
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by JackG
FWIW, the time diff was 1.5 seconds, not 2. And it's a huge assumption backed up by no facts that "the time made up in the straights would be minor" if the Shelby weren't sick. We just don't know.
Finally, my whole point was that this thread smacks of snobbery against anything not Porsche. The Shelby was being dismissed because it is a Ford, and that's a mistake. Look at what won the shootout. A Ford GT. 
|
Just your opinion. I didn't see any snobbery at all. Is someone a snob just because he prefers a lighter and more agile roadster to a much heavier but more powerful GT? Different people prefer different cars, and prefer to pay up for different attributes. Some pay up for raw power. Others pay up for superior engineering that keeps weight low without sacrificing comfort and rigidity.
Frankly, considering that this is a Porsche Boxster forum, I would say that most other cars get a fair treatment, especially when compared to other forums. For some reason you care very much about "d**k" stereotypes which are mostly spread by "d**ks" anyway.
Z.
|
|
|
11-27-2006, 04:07 PM
|
#3
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 530
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by z12358
Just your opinion. I didn't see any snobbery at all. Is someone a snob just because he prefers a lighter and more agile roadster to a much heavier but more powerful GT? Different people prefer different cars, and prefer to pay up for different attributes. Some pay up for raw power. Others pay up for superior engineering that keeps weight low without sacrificing comfort and rigidity.
Frankly, considering that this is a Porsche Boxster forum, I would say that most other cars get a fair treatment, especially when compared to other forums. For some reason you care very much about "d**k" stereotypes which are mostly spread by "d**ks" anyway.
Z.
|
Remove that chip from your shoulder, Z. I seemed to have hit a nerve with you. Maybe you saw yourself in there somewhere?
In any case, I seriously doubt you have a clue what I care about.
Have a nice day.
__________________
Jack
2000 Boxster S - gone -
2006 Audi A6 Quattro 3.2
|
|
|
11-27-2006, 04:38 PM
|
#4
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Northeast USA
Posts: 910
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by JackG
Remove that chip from your shoulder, Z. I seemed to have hit a nerve with you. Maybe you saw yourself in there somewhere?
In any case, I seriously doubt you have a clue what I care about.
Have a nice day.
|
Jack didn't mean to be insulting, so if you saw it that way, I apologize.
Peace.
Z.
|
|
|
11-27-2006, 04:46 PM
|
#5
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 530
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by z12358
Jack didn't mean to be insulting, so if you saw it that way, I apologize.
Peace.
Z.
|
Fair enough... the written word is easily taken the wrong way. My bad.
__________________
Jack
2000 Boxster S - gone -
2006 Audi A6 Quattro 3.2
|
|
|
11-27-2006, 04:58 PM
|
#6
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: CO
Posts: 56
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by JackG
FWIW, the time diff was 1.5 seconds, not 2. And it's a huge assumption backed up by no facts that "the time made up in the straights would be minor" if the Shelby weren't sick. We just don't know.
Finally, my whole point was that this thread smacks of snobbery against anything not Porsche. The Shelby was being dismissed because it is a Ford, and that's a mistake. Look at what won the shootout. A Ford GT. 
|
Since I started the thread primarily about the commercial and the use of the Carrera in it, I feel obligated to respond. Call it what you wish however, loyalty to a brand and espousing its superiority did not start with Porsche owners. If you take a look back in history, GM and Ford represent one of the longest standing rivalries in the history of automakers. Yet no one seems compelled to call a GM owner "elitest snob" if they have a picture of Calvin pissing on a Ford decal on thier back window, why is that? Just because we may be proud of our vehicles and thier capabilities does not make us snobs.
Jack, I would bet my paycheck, small as it may be, that the GT 500 would still lose out against any of these cars besides the Dodge. Simply saying since it has 500hp does not make it any faster through the track. If this were the case, then the first place winner at 190hp would not have been a factor. Keep in mind the Lotus had the lowest hp in the group and the closest delta in hp was the Cayman S which it beat, and the Cayman had 105 more horses. So the moral of the story is horsepower does not a fast car make.
Last edited by SigmaPi; 11-27-2006 at 05:11 PM.
|
|
|
11-27-2006, 05:18 PM
|
#7
|
|
Guest
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by SigmaPi
So the moral of the story is horsepower does not a fast car make.
|
SigmaPi, I love your "Yoda" quote at the end!
|
|
|
|
11-27-2006, 05:36 PM
|
#8
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Annapolis Maryland
Posts: 1,528
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by SigmaPi
So the moral of the story is horsepower does not a fast car make.
|
Okaaaaaayyyyy...If you say so...
|
|
|
11-27-2006, 05:40 PM
|
#9
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 530
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by SigmaPi
Jack, I would bet my paycheck, small as it may be, that the GT 500 would still lose out against any of these cars besides the Dodge. Simply saying since it has 500hp does not make it any faster through the track. If this were the case, then the first place winner at 190hp would not have been a factor. Keep in mind the Lotus had the lowest hp in the group and the closest delta in hp was the Cayman S which it beat, and the Cayman had 105 more horses. So the moral of the story is horsepower does not a fast car make.
|
The Elise is a car that few can live with as a daily driver. It's a track car. Throw in a "track package" which includes gumball tires the article said "wouldn't last 2000 miles on the street", and it's no wonder the Elise topped the group.
But we all know that there are tracks where you can run momentum cars successfully, and other tracks where they really suffer. When the momentum cars suffer, the horsepower cars shine. However, in daily life on the street, we don't live in a momentum world. Horsepower is king.
If you run up on a Shelby on the street, he'll eat you alive. If you see him on a track, it's my wager with him hitting on all 8 cylinders, he'll likely do the same. The ride just won't be nearly as much fun in the Shelby.
We've beaten this to death. We'll just have to wait on the next test, with a healthy Shelby, to see how it compares. Until then, it's all just opinion.
__________________
Jack
2000 Boxster S - gone -
2006 Audi A6 Quattro 3.2
|
|
|
11-27-2006, 07:39 PM
|
#10
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: El Paso
Posts: 1,147
|
Comparing a Shelby GT500 and a Boxster is absurd...kind of like...well...a kangaroo....wait for it....SHOPPING! OK, React.
__________________
'05 987 Basalt Black/Sand Beige
5 spd, 18" wheels
AH-64 Apache
RC-12 Guardrail
RC-7 Crazy Hawk
"If the wings are traveling faster than
the fuselage, it's probably a helicopter--
and therefore, unsafe" --Unknown
|
|
|
11-28-2006, 12:07 AM
|
#11
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 171
|
OI!
Leave our native animals out of this
|
|
|
11-28-2006, 05:12 AM
|
#12
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: El Paso
Posts: 1,147
|
I have always wanted to eat one....I am slowly eating my way through the animal kingdom. Kind of a hobby.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by FIG
OI!
Leave our native animals out of this 
|
__________________
'05 987 Basalt Black/Sand Beige
5 spd, 18" wheels
AH-64 Apache
RC-12 Guardrail
RC-7 Crazy Hawk
"If the wings are traveling faster than
the fuselage, it's probably a helicopter--
and therefore, unsafe" --Unknown
|
|
|
11-28-2006, 08:49 AM
|
#13
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: mid-Michigan
Posts: 562
|
Superman can kick Batman's ass!
__________________
2000 Arctic Silver Boxster
SPQR
Senatus Populusque BoxsterRomanus
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:23 AM.
| |