![]() |
Quote:
1. He is in England and in his video he is driving from the right side of the car so it is a European spec car. So no SAI system. So no spot to put a vacuum gauge like a U.S. spec. car which has a vacuum port on the front crossover tube left side near the throttle body. In plain view. 2. I assume he took things apart looking for a place to connect the vacuum gauge. I believe he found the vacuum port for the EVAP system which I think is on the front crossover tube right hand side on the bottom. Out of plain view. So as he moved and turned the rubber collar over the check valve came out. Not assumptions: 1.He has no EVAP system related codes. Which he should have because if the check valve were out of the vacuum port then the EVAP system could not get vacuum so would fail the first EVAP test by the DME/ECU and would set a code. So most likely he was not running with the check valve unplugged from the vacuum port. 2.Even if the check valve were missing from the vacuum port the vacuum leak would be from a hole about an 1/8"th -1/4" in diameter. Very doubtful that would cause his issue. Also if I understand your thoughts correctly your saying there is a possible problem with a vacuum leak where the check valve is supposed to go. So how would you test your theory???? Put everything back the way it is supposed to go. Then test drive the car??? If that fixed the problem great. But if the problem is still there he would have to go through the work of getting back into the engine bay, accessing the vacuum port and doing the vacuum test. That is a lot of extra work to run a simple test. Do it while your there. |
4 Attachment(s)
Quote:
So here are the readings from the vacuum gauge in the two different ways that you have suggested… Oh and does anyone know the thread and size of the fuel rail pressure test port cover as pictured? As they’ve sent me a kit without a size I can use |
Colacharlie.
Your vacuum readings are low. Ideal would be 17-21 in.hg I see lots of oil dirt residue on the AOS tubes and other parts of the engine. So that tells me that you have minor vacuum leaks at the connections and or tubes themselves. Another common place for a vacuum leak is the oil fill tube that runs from the trunk to the engine. It can rub the edge of the body where it passes into the engine bay. (hope that makes sense). These are closed system engines with crankcase vacuum rather then pressure. So anytime you see oil or oil dirt residue on the upper engine area, around the intake, or the AOS you have vacuum leaks. If your vacuum gauge needle is rock steady when you test then there is most likely no valve train issues. I think your low vacuum is all down to minor vacuum leaks. With the way your car acts in the video and that fact that it is smooth at any RPM until you give it more gas. Vacuum leaks don't typically act that way once your at around 2000-3000 RPM so I think it may be more of a fuel delivery problem rather then an air metering problem. Low fuel pressure or low volume. Once you step on the throttle there is a momentary lag in the fuel systems ability to meet demand. thats the theory anyway. Although a faulty MAF (which you have changed out so it is most likely good) or a faulty Throttle position sensor (which has not been tested) could have the same affect. A confusing thing to me is that you have no misfire codes and your Durametric shows no misfires. Are you certain it is misfiring???? I would do a fuel pressure test at the rail (which I see your preparing to do) next. There is a spec. for key on engine off. and a spec. for engine running. If you need those spec. let me know I will look them up. Sorry I do not know the thread size for the fuel rail test valve. unbelievable that the sent you a fuel test kit without correct fittings. |
Quote:
When I say misfiring- I mean that’s what it feels like, but yes the computer shows no misfires. I had a very similar feeling recently on my motorbike and it turned out to be a coil pack but I thought the best way to describe it at the start of all this was like a misfire. I am also thinking it is probably a fuel issue. Just to clarify- do you mean that I probably have some small vacuum leaks to address but this will not cause the present problem? Or the small vacuum leaks are the problem? Or are you thinking it is probably the fuel pump, or the regulator, or a injector O ring maybe? …. And yes please do provide the measurements for the fuel Pressure test if you can buddy Tia Pps- sorry IDK but my pic converter on my iPhone is only letting me compress and not letting me resize unfortunately |
Yes it looks from the oil dirt residue that you have some minor vacuum leaks.
I do not think they are the problem. They do need fixed though for optimum performance. The fact that you can drive the car at any speed or RPM as long as you hold the throttle steady then only get the judder when giving it more gas is not how a typical vacuum leak responds at higher RPM's So it acts more like fuel delivery issues. either low pressure or low volume. if it was injectors fouled or not working correctly I would expect the engine to run rough at all RPM Yours will run smooth as long as you don't demand fuel under load. So if it is a fuel problem I think it would be a pressure or volume issue. Another possibility is a restricted exhaust. Both low vacuum and your judder could be caused by a restricted exhaust. You can test for restricted exhaust with the vacuum gauge. PITA I know With engine at operating temp hook up the gauge and hold your RPM as evenly as you can at 2000 RPM for a minute to minute and a half. watch the needle if it slowly drops from the initial reading you have an exhaust restriction. like plugged cats. or bent exhaust or something not allowing exhaust out. If exhaust can't get out fuel/air can't get in. ' |
Colacharlie
The only specs. I could find in my book are for 1997-2001 models so you may want to do a search of the forum to see if you can find other specs. Or post another thread and see if anyone knows. Here are the specs. I found engine off key on. 3.8 plus or minus 0.2 bar engine idling 3.3 plus or minus 0.2 bar |
Colacharlie
One more thing sorry. When you found the P1128 code was your check engine light on? Erase the code if you have not and lets see if and when it comes back. |
Quote:
I’m beginning to think that the engine light on the dash is not working, as it did not come on with the fault that is showing on the computer. I’ll also check tomorrow that it’s working when I first turn the key slightly �� … I was watching this (thanks STL) but I can’t find a fuel pressure regulator as it’s shown in the video https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=hddx5Ux1v4Y Unfortunately it doesn’t say the year of his car and I wonder if mine actually does have one or not? |
It would be best to just put the vacuum gauge directly into the intake vacuum port and plug the check valve off.
So NO TEE fitting just what ever you need to hook the gauge directly to the intake. If you need a length of hose between the gauge and the intake so you can sit in the car and work the throttle and watch the RPM thats fine. With that check valve (which connects to the EVAP system) connected and involved in the test there is the possibility that the EVAP system could run it's test while your trying to do the exhaust restriction test. What happens is that the DME/ECU sends a signal that puts the entire EVAP system under vacuum then checks for leaks over a period of time. So it draws on vacuum from the intake. If that happens at the same time your holding RPM at 2000 and watching the needle the needle is going to slowly drop just like an exhaust restriction. So you could get conflicting results. hope that makes sense. You may throw EVAP codes or other codes because the EVAP vacuum line it is unplugged during the test. If you do just clear them after you done testing. |
Quote:
I believe your fuel filter is inside the fuel tank. So the fuel systems are a little different. I think the change started with 2002 models. So you probably have what they call a closed fuel system. My book says the closed system can not be volume tested the way the car in the video is tested. says you need special equipment. But you can pressure test at the fuel rail. |
2002 is when they moved the fuel filter as part of the fuel sender.
Blue - Why do you keep calling the air induction system the evap system? The black/white check valve connects to the air induction which includes the vacuum canister, flapper in the resonance tube and even the valve on tiptronic cars to the tiptronic cooler. EVAP system is for the fuel system like the carbon canister. |
Quote:
Perhaps I am incorrect Which vacuum canister are you referring too??? Where is the EVAP system drawing it's vacuum from on his car?? Vacuum hose layout for European spec. cars would be helpful. |
1 Attachment(s)
the vacuum lines, change over, cannister, check valve, sai are all part of the air induction system, same as ours. EVAP is for the fuel system. Only thing different on his car would be the secondary O2 sensors not being present and a ROW tune, otherwise it is the same as us spec. On RHD the location of a couple parts will just be different, but they will still be there such as the vacuum line to the fuel damper (on the right side of engine instead of left). The intake & vacuum system are all the same as US cars. EVAP is going to be at the front of the car like ours in the right wheel well.
You can get the row PET from here: https://www.porsche.com/central-eastern-europe/en/accessoriesandservice/classic/genuineparts/originalpartscatalogue/ The vacuum cannister is circled in blue: |
Quote:
Even thou the components for the EVAP. system are in the wheel well. The system is still put under vacuum for leak testing by the DME/ECU. So it is connect to a manifold vacuum source somehow. If you have things like changeover valves, check valves, charcoal cannisters, vacuum cannisters, included as part of various vacuum test you run a high risk of inaccurate and misleading readings. If a valve energizes and opens to something like a vacuum cannister while your doing a exhaust restriction test. The needle on the gauge is going to drop slowly just like it would if the exhaust is restricted. That is why you isolate as many vacuum operated systems as possible from those types of tests. That is why I tell the OP to run his test either without the check valve connected or to run two test one with it connected and one without it connected. What the system is called downstream of the check valve I couldn't care less. I know it has a vacuum component that can skew the test. When I tell the OP to include or don't include check valve in the test. he knows what I mean. |
Just wanted to make sure. You had me very confused when you were calling it the evap system. You have educated me enough so it's all good.
|
Quote:
Actually I am not very familiar with Porsche's of any model. My 2000S is the only one I have ever had "hands on". But I never have any issues with it so I don't have to dig very deep into it. But an internal combustion engine is just an air pump. No matter what make of car it is in. But I do know at least the basics of most systems on older cars like our Boxsters. Things like EVAP, SAI, they are very similar from one make to the next. So if you have good knowledge of the basic's of a system it's like a good foundation to a house. You can use and build on that knowledge no matter what make of car they are on. Things like vacuum testing for diagnostics, using a vacuum gauge to set timing, or carbs on old school cars, compression testing, and general diagnostics I have been doing that for 50+ years. Now electrics that's my weak spot:eek: I know nothing, not a damn thing about turbo's, except they push air and are more or less free horse power. |
The evap system hooks to the plenum just beyond the TB, it runs into the same connector that the AOS breather connects to. It has nothing to do with any of the vac lines that he has pictured so far.
STL is right, some euro cars (Germany and GB) have the SAI system just like ours. There are several different versions of emissions tunes for Europe. Only true ROW cars (sold in middle east for example) did not have the SAI system. ColaCharlie - do yourself a favor here. There is a diagram of your vac system in the trunk. The line that comes off of one of the bank 1 (passenger side) boots either on the plenum or resonance tube, has become dislodged. As I said earlier, it is the tubing that goes to the SAI and resonance flapper actuator, along with the vac reservoir. Study the diagram, find pics of how everything should be connected (Stl has a nice pic on the post he suggested you read) and hook your stuff up properly. Then see what happens. This isn't rocket science. You have a vac leak on bank 1. You are leaning out and detonating (not misfiring, big difference) on bank 1. It is happening at WOT because your fuel trims can adjust for the leak while under closed loop operations. When it goes open loop (i.e. WOT) you lean out and throw the code. If you don't believe me, buy a $15 elm327 tester and download your long term fuel trim data. $5 says that your bank 1 is going to be positive and much higher than bank 2 which should be close to zero or at least very low positive single digits. Sent from my SM-G970U1 using Tapatalk |
Quote:
I keep looking at the picture in "Car dies" thread that your referring to and also Colacharlies picture. In both pictures the white end of the check valve is plugged into a three way connector. In the picture in "Car dies" thread one of the other two legs of the connector , connect to a four way connector. The vacuum canister is just to the right. The third leg is connected to the electric /over vacuum switch that lets the resonance flapper move. So if I understand you correctly your saying either the resonance flapper leg is disconnected or the vacuum canister leg is disconnected??? Or am I misunderstanding?? Thanks for the clarification on where the EVAP hooks in. I will check it out on my Boxster tomorrow so I have a visual. |
Blue, no worries dude, it has literally taken me 2 years to piece together my understanding of this cars vac system, and there's still more to learn!
In post 21 of this thread he is pointing at the check valve, the black end of which is not connected to anything, and says "not sure where this goes". Check out stls pic - that end should connect to a hose that runs to one of the intake boots. On most it's the bank 1 plenum boot, on mine is the bank 1 resonance tube boot. Sent from my SM-G970U1 using Tapatalk |
Fwiw, bank 1 vac leaks have been the bane of existence for many forum members over the years. That circuit is complicated, there are a bunch of parts, ALL of them are nearly impossible to access without removing the intakes (at the very least the plenum and resonance tubes), and all can fail. I was recently having a sidebar with Stl about deleting that whole circuit if possible, and when he asked me why I said to prevent vac leaks down the road lol.
Sent from my SM-G970U1 using Tapatalk |
Ike no sweat.
I got what your saying now. yes there is a hose missing from the check valve to the vacuum port in the OP picture. My thought has been that the black end of the check valve had be inserted directly into the vacuum port by a previous owner. And as Colacharlie was trying to find a vacuum port to connect a vacuum gauge to he pulled it loose because the port was turned down so the check valve was under the collar. He saw the check valve first then latter found the vacuum port to the side. The reason I thought this was because in the pictures you can see Charlie has hose clams loose, a AOS hose disconnected and what looks like a screwdriver handle in the picture. Also there were no codes for anything. except for the no codes everything above was a guess at best. |
There is a code though. He showed an O2 code earlier
|
Hi all. Vacuum test complete plus a smoke test and small leaks found and O rings renewed, plus fuel pressure test complete and all in range and spot on. Car runs a bit better but still judders and is still horrible. I’m going to buy a set of injectors (second hand) for my 2.7 2002 and wonder if someone might know the product code of the injectors? Ps I have no access to the car Atm
|
Quote:
Ike84 or STL-986 will probably know I take it your test for exhaust restriction tested ok? Did you see if your CEL works?? I can also be tested with your Durametric. Did you do another vacuum test after you found the small vacuum leaks to see if it brought the vacuum readings up?? |
Quote:
So was it a pending code???? Don't remember if Durametric shows pending codes. Or Did it throw the code because he started it while working on it with somethig disconnected.???? Knowing when a code was thrown and under what conditions is kinda important. Amazes me that Duarametric does not show freeze frame data. Bull **************** for the price of the thing. Some units even provide a time stamp in the freeze frame data. |
For original injectors Porsche 2000 3.2 motor its a 996 606 120 01 .... There is a post for a 987 injector swap but you have to modify it .You have to add the groove for the injector clamp . Its a steel keeper that clamps the injector to to he rail .
|
Quote:
0280156053 |
yea. Durametric isnt all that it is hyped up to be.
For codes it shows pending & set codes all as just "Codes" I'm also disapointed it wont do custom pids either. Besides the limited coding it can do, all it is doing is ready PID's. If we could ever get a list of all of the PID's it reads then we can just create them in Torquefor and not really need to buy the durametric. |
the injectors for the 2.7, 3.2, and 3.4 are all the same from 00 - 02. the dme just runs them on different duty cycles to adjust for different fueling needs.
these injectors are no longer being made. they were a special part made by bosch specifcally for porsche. you can remove yours and send them out for cleaning and testing (which costs about $30 per injector plus shipping), buy a remanufactured set from a company called reman, or do the 986.2 injector swap. If youre worried about the injectors, I recommend the latter - you can get them for $25 a piece and the modification takes less than 5 min per injector with a dremmel. before you do this though, do as blue says - repeat your vac test. if your vac is still low then you haven't fixed your problem. bad injectors dont cause low vac pressure. |
Quote:
The needle reacts very much like a single cylinder valve train issue. (if it is a single cyl misfire) or multiple cylinder valve train issues if it is multiple cylinder misfires. The needle action is identical in some instances. |
Colacharlie,
This is going to sound crazy: With the recent work done on your car (the Variocam work). Was any of fuel injector wiring disconnected???? If it was go back thru them and make "certain" the right wiring connector is connected to the proper injector. A Fella here on the forum has been having a very similar problem as you. Misfires without any codes. Bogging or judder when trying to accelerate. He had two injectors crossed up. Let us know what you find.;) |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
Replaced all six injectors and it’s still the same, plus I’ve got more codes up now Any thoughts on what to do next / what process to follow now I’ve got this **************** list? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
with all those different codes & on both banks, it is most likely a wiring issue. Something isn't connected right or not at all.
|
Quote:
NOTE to anyone changing their injectors- bank 1 easy. Bank 2 a total and utter muva pucker! |
Quote:
I found myself so disheartened with ‘Hans’ the 2.7, that after spending so much money and so much time and the problem still persists, that I have bought myself a 3.2 S low mileage from a guy who is most excellent. I am lucky and have the space so that Hans (the 2.7) has a cosy place to sleep until I have the heartfelt energy it takes to continue on. I am wondering, as I only replaced three of the coil packs (on Hans) - my question and pondering is that- does the ECU read only the voltage to the spark plugs, and thus would not show a coil pack failure on the Durametric? Or if one of the remaining three (old) coil packs are potentially failing1 would that potentially cause this problem, and would it show up on the Durametric? |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:02 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website