Go Back   986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners > Porsche Boxster & Cayman Forums > Boxster General Discussions

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 09-21-2006, 09:17 AM   #12
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Denver
Posts: 740
I tried to stay out of this - I really did. But I'm so very tired of "makes sense" type of arguements taking the place of real analysis, engineering, and science.

Typcially, these types of logical fallacies fall into Cum Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc (With this, therefore because of this) - correlation implies causation. Essentially, somebody takes lots of short drives and gets the RMS problem - therefore, the short drives caused the RMS problems.

Where's the science or analysis in the arguement that short hop drives cause RMS? Because a sales manager "who formerly worked at Porsche headquarters and seems to have a lot of technical/engineering knowledge" says so? Please. Because some Dr. X takes short drives and then has an RMS problem? Annecdotal. But, throw in a little pseudo science and it sure sounds plausible huh? The problem is that any two items can be correlated but simple correlation doesn't mean causation.
__________________

'06 Cayenne Turbo S, Beige Metallic/Tan

Ex - '99 Arctic Silver, Red Interior, Silver Top
denverpete is offline   Reply With Quote
 



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page