Insurance cheaper on S than Base??
Must be going crazy. Exploring two same year 987 models. One is base. The other is S. When checking the insurance rates with my broker, the S is cheaper than the base. Why would that be, generally?
|
S drivers are safer ;)
|
Likely user error by the quoter.
If you get quotes from a few different places I would assume that will be proven wrong. Strangely what the other poster said about S driver’s safer may have some validity... if in the insurance model S’s happen to have lower incident rates then I suppose it is conceivable and they write premiums for S’s at less. Seems flawed logic, but a nice windfall for the S driver. |
It is now official, the insurance industry confirms that the 'S' is better, safer than the Base
Done The arguments can end Base vs S There may be some options on the 'S' your looking at that checks some boxes. How much difference are you seeing? My 'S' is the cheapest car to insure of my 4 cars |
My 986s costs less then my camry for same coverage by roughly $500/year and since I actually insure it for 6 months it’s 75% less over the year. Funny as the boxster is worth considerably more if written off compared to the camry
|
I was loking at a C6 vette and quote was nearly same. A lot depends on age driving records and credit rating beleive it or not.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Most of it’s based on historical accident rates. More bases were likely written off by inattentive drivers that bought the car for the badge. |
Quote:
. |
Quote:
I’m referring to first owners to clarify lol. Anyone buying a used Porsche is an enthusiast S or not. But if you’re forking out 50k for a sports car you might as well pay 60 for the S if you’re looking to go fast. I expect upon first purchase new buyers the base models were wrecked more frequently. |
Don't have any clue about the difference between insurance costs, but just to make sure there is no misunderstanding for newbie's, neither of these cars are "fast" by ANY stretch of the imagination. Porsche's own specifications list the 0-60 time's as less than 1 second between the two models. Buy a base and save some money or buy an S and spend some money, either way just enjoy the ride...they're great cars.
|
Quote:
|
Agreed, the base vs S discussion has been played out for far too long. For 30 hp and larger brakes you also get more weight to negate any gains. Again, on average, a base will cost less to purchase, and the specs simply are not that far apart, sorry there're just not. Talk to Porsche who built them not me. You are very correct, faster is a relative term. The only way to really quantify is via specs or timed runs like in an AX. I know, I know, a lot of variables. But even averaged over several runs S's DO NOT win these events. Look to miata's, civic si's, Ford Focus, etc. I'll get off my box now.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I weight ratios S to base is 2855 pounds vs 2777 less than 100lb larger moto and breaks most likely difference. Gain is much better breaking and more cubic inches. Not saying base isnt a nice car just making statements for someone looking, should point out the differences. |
If I had to guess, I'd say its because more bases were built so presumably insurance companies have more claims on bases than S's.
|
I'm all about that Base
IMHO, the best 986 is the 1999. Love them all though.
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/7PCkvCPvDXk?rel=0" frameborder="0" allow="autoplay; encrypted-media" allowfullscreen></iframe> |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:16 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website