![]() |
Justification for 18inch
Nothing looks better than a boxster with 18s compared to 17s I have. Asthetics, stance, nice but with it comes that dreaded xtra rotating mass! Do any of you have regrets of going +1 on our cars? Is it really noticeable? Or are most folks doing it just for the asthetics and just used to it and forget it. I'm not concerned so much of ride quality. Temptation is killing me!
|
I went from turbo look turbo twist 17's to Carrera lite 18's. I'm pretty sure the twists were aftermarket. The 18" wheels with tires actually weighed less than the 17" wheels and tires. Same brand and model tires. The ride is about the same. As you know the look is way better. I don't really see any disadvantages except for the tires cost a little more.
|
My 18” Lt. Carrera wheels and tires don’t weigh much more than my 17” Boxster II wheels and tires. And the 18’s are 1/2” wider front and back with wider tires. I like the look of the 18’s better, but for everyday driving on what passes for roads here in NJ I like the 17’s and an extra 1/2” of sidewall between my butt and the road!
|
|
|
http://986forum.com/forums/uploads02...1512441425.jpg
Heres the 2002 I have here with 18's on it also. |
Prefer the Twist but that's a nice looking car in Guards red!
|
986 is noticeably more "nimble" with stock 17" tires than stock 18" size. Easier to slide around, spin the rear tires etc. If the Carrera II wheel came in 17" I would have at least 1 set.
|
Justification for 18inch
I personally find it laughable that anyone could say that. My 2001 Boxster S was built with/for 18" turbo twist wheels. The vehicle was built for them. 17's would require a different ratio from the transmission to the wheels. Basic geometry people.
|
Quote:
Might not want to be quite so condescending |
The SE comes stock with the 18” Carreras mounted with 5mm spacers so I don’t consider them +1. At any rate the ride and handling are perfect for me. My XKR was on 20s, our S5 is on 19s and the Explo is on 20s, all stock. We don’t know anything other than low profile in our garage for 3 season driving here in the Catskills. The Explo and S5 are on narrow, higher profile 18s with Blizzaks for the winter and we see no appreciable difference in ride quality. Dry handling is another matter due to the snow tires.
I typically run 34/39 lbs (f/r) on the 986. It’s a personal preference. In any case, you do have to really watch the potholes with any low profile tires, especially if you run lower tire pressures. For me, that’s the only downside. |
I've had 2 sets of 17's, 3 sets of 18's and one set of 19's on my boxster. I couldn't really tell any difference between 17 and 18 inch wheels. I think your tires have a bigger influence on ride quality. I didn't notice much of a performance difference either. The 18's I have on now weigh less and ride better than everything I've had so far. Not by much, but a little. 19's were horrible though. Not so much the ride quality. They were boat anchors and I could instantly notice the performance loss
|
I'm running 22's all around. Man up.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
That's an odd series of words resulting nonsensical gibberish. :rolleyes: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
RobertKing is kinda new around here so we can forgive his misunderstanding of final tire circumference. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:20 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website