986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners

986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners (http://986forum.com/forums/index.php)
-   Boxster General Discussions (http://986forum.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=5)
-   -   Does Boxster mean you couldn't afford a 911? (http://986forum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=59775)

Bryanf 12-10-2015 02:25 PM

I have to say, I drove a 2004 Carrera the other day and it knocks the socks off my boxster s. I just can't justify the $$. Bang for your buck, boxster wins hands down.

Chuck W. 12-10-2015 04:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BrokenLinkage (Post 476048)
Who is Jeremy Clark?

Quote:

Originally Posted by amagalla (Post 476145)
no one...now. ;)

From Wikipedia ..

Jeremy Charles Robert Clarkson is an English broadcaster, journalist and writer who specialises in motoring. He is best known for co-presenting the BBC TV show Top Gear with Richard Hammond and James May from October 2002 to March 2015.

DWBOX2000 12-10-2015 04:51 PM

My friend is bouncing back and forth between a boxster s and 996 purchase. He is an air cooled 911 guy and never thought much of the Boxsters or any water pampers. He picked mine up and drove it from PA to MA and love the handling. As.a result, he is now actively looking. I am curious Bryanf, when you wrote the 996 knocked the socks off the boxster s, did you mean in every area, 0-60, top speed, other? It would help him to get some opinions. I had a 77 911 C3.0 which I enjoyed but I knew when I got back in I wanted something a bit more refined and a convertible. So far, the 2000 s has been awesome. No complaints, I feel very, very lucky to have it as a toy.
Thanks,
David

JayG 12-10-2015 06:45 PM

Well I have both a 04 986 S and a 04 996 Targa.
Both are great cars. While I like the extra 60 or so HP in the 996, I prefer to drive the Boxster. I find it more fun to drive, handles better and hell, nothing beats a ragtop in San Diego.

When I do back road drives with the local PCA club, I have no problem keeping up with and sometimes crawling up the ass of 911's. Sure on the straights, they pull away, but as soon as we get into the twisties, my little Boxster shines

borz 12-11-2015 04:19 AM

Ditto, I also own both, a 996 Millennium and a Boxster S, the Boxster is just more "fun", plus it's a convertible.., the Boxster S is IMO, the best sports car ever made!

Twomato 12-11-2015 05:42 AM

The maint risk/expense is the same which leaves the Boxster/Cayman as the better buy. Just sold my 996 C4 and now hunting for as new as I can afford Cayman S.

Porsche9 12-11-2015 06:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Twomato (Post 476214)
The maint risk/expense is the same which leaves the Boxster/Cayman as the better buy. Just sold my 996 C4 and now hunting for as new as I can afford Cayman S.

Cayman S is my next Porsche too. I Don't think the Caymen get the same flack as the Boxster does compare to the 911 even though the Caymen is just a Boxster hardtop.

Gelbster 12-11-2015 08:09 AM

If technical fact is an issue (smile!) just ask a 911 enthusiast about "snap oversteer" or "lift off oversteer" .Without PSM the rear engined cars are inherently worse handling than a mid engined car.
Just Google the terms - there are lots of examples,videos and tech explanations. Very few 911/996 drivers actually have the skills to correct the problem on public roads and stay in their lane.
Ever Wondered Just How Necessary PSM Might Be? - The Truth About Cars

BIGJake111 12-11-2015 08:37 AM

Well to be fair the main appeal of the 911 I hear from owners isn't the larger power figure, they actually prefer the greater challenge that rear engine provides.

They treat rear engine vs mid like automatic vs manual.

Bryanf 12-11-2015 05:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DWBOX2000 (Post 476172)
My friend is bouncing back and forth between a boxster s and 996 purchase. He is an air cooled 911 guy and never thought much of the Boxsters or any water pampers. He picked mine up and drove it from PA to MA and love the handling. As.a result, he is now actively looking. I am curious Bryanf, when you wrote the 996 knocked the socks off the boxster s, did you mean in every area, 0-60, top speed, other? It would help him to get some opinions. I had a 77 911 C3.0 which I enjoyed but I knew when I got back in I wanted something a bit more refined and a convertible. So far, the 2000 s has been awesome. No complaints, I feel very, very lucky to have it as a toy.

Thanks,

David


The power of the carrera really surprised me, A LOT more than my 02 S and I was driving an automatic. The noticeable power difference is the only reason I say it knocks the socks off the boxster. The boxster seems to handle just as good if not better. The interiors feel almost identical to me (minus the small back seat of coarse).

Teddyonine 12-12-2015 02:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BIGJake111 (Post 476085)
It means you can't afford the Cheesecake Factory.

Good one, Jake.

Smallblock454 12-12-2015 02:39 AM

If you don't have the balls to drive a 986, than buy a 911. :D

Regards
Markus

Xpit77 12-12-2015 04:50 AM

I`m slowly making my way down the Porsche chassis re. engine location. My first was a 944S, currently a 986 so I guess a 911 is in my future.:cool:

kk2002s 12-12-2015 04:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BIGJake111 (Post 476247)
Well to be fair the main appeal of the 911 I hear from owners isn't the larger power figure, they actually prefer the greater challenge that rear engine provides.

They treat rear engine vs mid like automatic vs manual.

This makes a lot of sense.
Could it be that driving a super balanced, slightly under powered, great handling boxster is actually taking the easy way
Versus
Driving an over steering, higher HP 911 that wants to kill you on each turn unless you super pay attention.

Oh no have we all been brain washed?
That's it Selling the Boxster, cashing in my kids savings bonds and buying a 996 turbo and getting my dignity back

JayG 12-12-2015 06:16 AM

slow down a minute cowboy...

The newer 911's (996 and newer) have far less oversteer. Porsche did changes to the suspension design and they are much better behaved with and without PSM

Yes, the lawn mower engined (air cooled) ones do rotate easily if you lift the gas in a turn, the newer ones have far less tendency to do that.

In any case, if t does start to come around, just stomp on the gas and it straightens out

Smallblock454 12-12-2015 09:07 AM

So rear end engine cars are more difficult to drive than mid engine cars? LOL.

Ever driven a mid and rear engine car without spability management systems? Maybe some should give those 911 big ball guys a 914/6 for a test drive on a rainy race track. :D

So at the end of the day, the Porsche marketing department has done a really good job by classifying the segments and get a maximum roi. ;)

Regards, Markus

JayG 12-12-2015 12:08 PM

I drive both a mid and rear engine Porsche without any stability control other than me.
No problem at all

Franco 12-12-2015 01:08 PM

I bought a Base Boxster because I could not afford the S let alone a 911. ;)


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:35 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website