986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners

986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners (http://986forum.com/forums/index.php)
-   Boxster General Discussions (http://986forum.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=5)
-   -   IMS failure - how can I confirm my engine is toast? (http://986forum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=57313)

Townhome 05-25-2015 06:58 AM

IMS failure - how can I confirm my engine is toast?
 
I just bought a 2005 Boxster S within IMS failure confirmed by the Porsche dealer. The seller said it still runs but not to start it as the oil has been drained and the oil filter removed by the dealer.
Is there an easy way to check to see if the engine is non-salvageable. Could I do a compression test to confirm? Do I need to pull the transmission to check the cams are still in phase? Does and IMS failure ruin all engines? Is there a possibility I can remove the transmission and clutch assembly and simply replace the bearing with an upgraded IMS bearing along with a new RM seal, a new clutch of course, simply flush the engine of any potential foreign particles and be up and running?
Thanks for the advice.

thstone 05-25-2015 07:16 AM

A full engine tear down is needed.

If the IMS bearing failed (or some other catastrophic failure), there are metal particles (of various sizes) everywhere in the engine. Turning over the engine, even by hand for a compression test, will grind all of those metal bits into the metal components in the engine.

To consider flushing the engine and replacing the IMS bearing without a full tear down is a fool's errand as there is already likely damage to many engine surfaces that needs to inspected and repaired.

flaps10 05-25-2015 07:17 AM

That engine needs to come apart completely. You can't resurrect a dead man by giving him a blood transfusion.

Compression is the least of your problems right now.

My car ran perfectly with no noises. It was a train wreck inside.

I'm assuming you got the car for cheap

Fintro11 05-25-2015 07:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Townhome (Post 451142)
I just bought a 2005 Boxster S within IMS failure confirmed by the Porsche dealer. The seller said it still runs but not to start it as the oil has been drained and the oil filter removed by the dealer.
Is there an easy way to check to see if the engine is non-salvageable. Could I do a compression test to confirm? Do I need to pull the transmission to check the cams are still in phase? Does and IMS failure ruin all engines? Is there a possibility I can remove the transmission and clutch assembly and simply replace the bearing with an upgraded IMS bearing along with a new RM seal, a new clutch of course, simply flush the engine of any potential foreign particles and be up and running?
Thanks for the advice.

You got that one before I could :(

Townhome 05-25-2015 08:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by flaps10 (Post 451147)
That engine needs to come apart completely. You can't resurrect a dead man by giving him a blood transfusion.

Compression is the least of your problems right now.

My car ran perfectly with no noises. It was a train wreck inside.

I'm assuming you got the car for cheap

Yes, I picked up the mint, well optioned car for $8K in our devalued canadian funds. That's about $6200 in usd.
The reason I asked if it was salvageable is I've read some (not many) have repaired the IMS without a tear down. I was just wish-full thinking.
Thx for your wise advice.

Townhome 05-25-2015 08:17 AM

Rather than a tear down and repair to the 3.2 my next thoughts are a 3.6 or 3.8 conversion.
I've done a couple of conversions in the past and have a well eqipped shop with a hoist. I considered an LS swap but looks like WAY too much work and Renegade offers limited instructions if any at all.
If my 3.2 is toast, which is the easiest and most beneficial upgrade?

BYprodriver 05-25-2015 08:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Townhome (Post 451142)
I just bought a 2005 Boxster S within IMS failure confirmed by the Porsche dealer. The seller said it still runs but not to start it as the oil has been drained and the oil filter removed by the dealer.
Is there an easy way to check to see if the engine is non-salvageable. Could I do a compression test to confirm? Do I need to pull the transmission to check the cams are still in phase? Does and IMS failure ruin all engines? Is there a possibility I can remove the transmission and clutch assembly and simply replace the bearing with an upgraded IMS bearing along with a new RM seal, a new clutch of course, simply flush the engine of any potential foreign particles and be up and running?
Thanks for the advice.

Step 1 remove oil filter housing & put your finger into the opening in the case where the filter attaches, feel around for metal particles. Step 2 remove oil sump plate & inspect what is on it in bright sunlight.

Jamesp 05-25-2015 08:18 AM

Having done this before. First off you have an oil filter that protects the journal bearings. Assuming it works (mine did) there won't be metal in the most sensitive parts of the engine which are likely pretty worn anyway.

1) remove the oil pan and the filter - you'll have metal debris in there if the IMSB failed, if you do,

2) Take out the plugs and scope the tops of the pistons. If there was valve contact replace the engine. If no valve contact:

3) Set the engine to zero timing remove the transmission. If you do not set the engine to zero timing and remove the IMSB cover plate the valve springs will move the cams and valve timing will be lost, you're hosed at this point.

4) With the transmission out and the engine set to zero timing (can't overstress zero timing) remove the IMS bearing cover. You have a single row IMSB, if you see a snap ring, you could replace the single row with another sealed single row. Make sure it is fully sealed as you will have loose metal in the oil and that will take out a bearing in short order if the contaminated oil gets into it.

Likely you will see what looks like a bad welding job in the counterbore that holds the bearing under the IMS bearing cover. If you see this the Intermediate shaft needs to be replaced and that is a full engine teardown. Get a new engine unless you're up for adventure.

This post won't be popular, and to be sure it does not follow the cultural norms of the forum but it makes sense as the engine is what it is. If you can breathe life into it with an inexpensive bearing some clean up work and a couple of quick oil changes its worth a shot.

flaps10 05-25-2015 10:42 AM

I'm not in conflict with what James said, I'm just skeptical of the results. But I only have one data point. My oil pan was clean when I dropped it and I wanted nothing more than to install a bearing, flush and go.

This was the truth:
http://i1045.photobucket.com/albums/...psi9k0syh6.jpg

In keeping with James response, the absolute cheapest way to drive your car (if the end of the IMS isn't trashed as he indicates) is to replace the bearing and flush.

Second cheapest is a used motor of unknown origin and history

3.6 or 3.8? You must have deeper pockets than I do. Going rate on those engines (again, unknown history and total crap shoot) is $10k all day long. Check that your ECU is compatible with the engine before even making that decision.

Not sure if rolling up your sleeves and doing it yourself is on the list of possibilities. I did all my own work and spent less than the unknown used option. I'm just a retarded engineer and managed.

OKCShooter 05-25-2015 11:08 AM

At $6200 US, I'd consider parting it out.

Make a little $ and save the headache.

Townhome 05-25-2015 11:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by flaps10 (Post 451178)
I'm not in conflict with what James said, I'm just skeptical of the results. But I only have one data point. My oil pan was clean when I dropped it and I wanted nothing more than to install a bearing, flush and go.

This was the truth.

In keeping with James response, the absolute cheapest way to drive your car (if the end of the IMS isn't trashed as he indicates) is to replace the bearing and flush.

Second cheapest is a used motor of unknown origin and history

3.6 or 3.8? You must have deeper pockets than I do. Going rate on those engines (again, unknown history and total crap shoot) is $10k all day long. Check that your ECU is compatible with the engine before even making that decision.

Not sure if rolling up your sleeves and doing it yourself is on the list of possibilities. I did all my own work and spent less than the unknown used option. I'm just a retarded engineer and managed.

That looks scary. Thanks for your input.

Gelbster 05-25-2015 11:34 AM

The 2005 may have the large diameter IMSB ? Check with other Forum members. Makes a difference because the only way to remove the large IMSB is a total engine dismantle.
There is a hack method of boring out the back of the crankcase halves but there is not much field experience/results from this new method.
Like James and Flaps ,I have just done a rebuild and it is stunningly expensive to do correctly. Lots more time than a regular engine,very specialized machine work and very little factory documentation to help.
Just be aware of what you might be getting into before you start. I am familiar with Jaguar engines and found this M96 very exacting!

Perfectlap 05-25-2015 11:47 AM

What is the build date? some of the first 2005 987s had the old bearing. But the revised bearing very rarely see failures. Also, the IMS is often blamed as the root of the failure when its actually something else entirely.

Jamesp 05-25-2015 11:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Perfectlap (Post 451188)
What is the build date? some of the first 2005 987s had the old bearing. But the revised bearing very rarely see failures. Also, the IMS is often blamed as the root of the failure when its actually something else entirely.

Excellent point.

Townhome 05-25-2015 12:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jamesp (Post 451189)
Excellent point.

Maybe an oil analysis would be a good idea to confirm the problem?
Cheap and easy thing to do.

JFP in PA 05-25-2015 12:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Townhome (Post 451192)
Maybe an oil analysis would be a good idea to confirm the problem?
Cheap and easy thing to do.

An oil analysis would be a waste of both time and money. Pull the sump cover, if it is loaded with ferrous grit and debris, it is over, the engine needs to come out and apart. Takes about 15 min. to do and you will know exactly where you stand.

thstone 05-25-2015 01:35 PM

I had three engine failures last year. This is what one of the filters looked like.

Even if the oil is flushed a couple of times and the IMS bearing is replaced, other components are already damaged (even if the engine runs) from all of this debris. If you can live with this, go for it; but it would be irresponsible to sell the car to an unsuspecting buyer.

http://i1114.photobucket.com/albums/...ps112ad98b.jpg

Bobiam 05-25-2015 03:22 PM

If your engine has a double row bearing it may have a failure but still run. Perhaps only for minutes until a full failure. Double row bearing engines have a chance of surviving an IMS partial failure.

Jamesp 05-25-2015 03:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thstone (Post 451200)
I had three engine failures last year. This is what one of the filters looked like.

Even if the oil is flushed a couple of times and the IMS bearing is replaced, other components are already damaged (even if the engine runs) from all of this debris. If you can live with this, go for it; but it would be irresponsible to sell the car to an unsuspecting buyer.

I think other parts *may* be damaged. I followed the trail of the metal chips in my engine when I tore it down. The timing chains carried the chips into the heads and back down into the sump area. The oil carried it to the oil pickup, then through the oil pump add into the filter. Upstream of the filter there was no evidence of chips, the oil galleys were chip free, and the cams and springs were chip free. The Variocams were chip free. The timing chains had a few chips. The chain ramps had lots of chips imbedded in them. The sump area walls were coated with chips. I agree reselling this car would require full disclosure of the failure if that is what happened.

Pdwight 05-25-2015 04:20 PM

A quick way to tell
 
Drop the pan and inspect.....you will know

Fintro11 05-25-2015 04:51 PM

Just throw in another engine that was my plan with that car

clickman 05-25-2015 06:14 PM

What engine?

Jake Raby 05-25-2015 08:26 PM

Extracting a failed bearing, and replacing it without full disassembly is a death sentence for the engine. When the bearing failed the engine probably saw collateral damage, with bent valves and etc. Thats aside from the extreme amount of metal debris in the engine that can only be removed with disassembly and ultrasonic cleaning.

Townhome 05-28-2015 05:20 AM

Well after pulling the pan I found a consderable amount of metal chips. Nothing big but too big to try to attempt to replace the IMS bearing and flush.
I have an offer on a 2005 3.2 replacement engine with 45,000 miles.
Thanks for all your wise advice guys.
Hugely appreciated.

Update: I won't be buying the used engine as its just too much$$$
Still looking for a replacement as splitting the cases to clean scares me. Too bad as this engine and car has been well cared for.

Townhome 05-30-2015 05:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by clickman (Post 451240)
What engine?

3.2 engine

Townhome 05-30-2015 05:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jamesp (Post 451189)
Excellent point.


The build date is Feb 2005.

Jamesp 05-30-2015 10:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Townhome (Post 451580)
Well after pulling the pan I found a consderable amount of metal chips. Nothing big but too big to try to attempt to replace the IMS bearing and flush.
I have an offer on a 2005 3.2 replacement engine with 45,000 miles.
Thanks for all your wise advice guys.
Hugely appreciated.

Update: I won't be buying the used engine as its just too much$$$
Still looking for a replacement as splitting the cases to clean scares me. Too bad as this engine and car has been well cared for.

You are likely looking at a new engine. The only slim possibility would be if the car came with the old style bearing which is removable without splitting the case and if the IMS shaft was not damaged. Chances of that are slim, and even then you've seen the dire predictions if you just replace the bearing and clean it up. Me, I'd roll the dice and at least look at the IMSB to decide how I wanted to go forward. There were folks who made comments when I was rebuilding my engine after an IMSB failure that it would not work (including the cleaning). That was 7000 miles ago. So much for the critics.

JFP in PA 05-30-2015 01:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jamesp (Post 451855)
So much for the critics.

Not a matter of being critical, very few engines that have suffered an IMS failure make it with a replacement bearing and not being taken apart and cleaned; the odds against you are very high. You were quite fortunate, literally "one of the few"............

Jamesp 05-30-2015 03:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JFP in PA (Post 451873)
Not a matter of being critical, very few engines that have suffered an IMS failure make it with a replacement bearing and not being taken apart and cleaned; the odds against you are very high. You were quite fortunate, literally "one of the few"............

I'd like to see the numbers on that. I did take mine apart and cleaned it with solvents, not ultrasonic. My sense is the stock oil filter does a better job than it is credited with as has been amply demonstrated when they are cut open. What do the chips take out? Seriously, provided the oil filter does not fail, they go through the oil pump and end up in the filter. If they are too big, the end up in the pan. The death blow isn't the chips, its the damage that created them. Now if an open bearing is chosen as an IMSB replacement using unfiltered oil, the story changes.

flaps10 05-30-2015 04:49 PM

There is where I have to disagree James. My main and rod bearings were heavily worn from those chips and my cam journals (they aren't really bearings in any sense) had some light scratches - thankfully light enough that I may have dodged a lightening bolt.

I do agree that the stock filter is better than it is given credit for, and it is certainly easier to inspect.

I'm also curious how the LN filter ( which I have installed ) is supposed to eliminate bypass since it mounts on the same location as the stock filter. Bypass is usually a function of the oil pressure relief and the LN doesn't touch that.

Jamesp 05-30-2015 05:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by flaps10 (Post 451888)
filter is better than it is given credit for, and it is certainly easier to inspect.

I'm also curious how the LN filter ( which I have installed ) is supposed to eliminate bypass since it mounts on the same location as the stock filter. Bypass is usually a function of the oil pressure relief and the LN doesn't touch that.

Apparently the stock filter housing has a spring and plate in the bottom that also acts as a bypass if the oil is cold enough. My rod and crank bearings were also worn, but evenly (not scratched) from 120K of freeway driving. The chips never made it past the filter in my case.

Wild Bill 05-30-2015 05:42 PM

Check vertex motors I think good prices.

flaps10 05-30-2015 06:38 PM

Good to know James, thanks for the clarity about the LN filter base.

Oh as to the recommendation that it needs a new engine - there aren't any. You can buy a short block from Porsche for rediculous money (relative to car value), or a rebuild from a VERY few sources, a used motor of unknown history, or get out your tools and figure it out as you and I (and a small hand full of others) have.

JFP in PA 05-31-2015 07:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jamesp (Post 451883)
I'd like to see the numbers on that. I did take mine apart and cleaned it with solvents, not ultrasonic. My sense is the stock oil filter does a better job than it is credited with as has been amply demonstrated when they are cut open. What do the chips take out? Seriously, provided the oil filter does not fail, they go through the oil pump and end up in the filter. If they are too big, the end up in the pan. The death blow isn't the chips, its the damage that created them. Now if an open bearing is chosen as an IMSB replacement using unfiltered oil, the story changes.

Obviously, I cannot speak for all attempts at this, but we have had three customers that had IMS failures (which we identified in the shop by pulling the sump covers) that then subsequently undertook DIY retrofit and multiple oil flushes (no engine disassembly), and none of them survived more than 200 miles.

You case is somewhat different in that you at least tried to mechanically remove as much debris as possible before returning the car to service. Most people actually do not attempt that.

thom4782 05-31-2015 12:41 PM

James

Did you use a sealed bearing when you replaced the IMSB?

Jamesp 06-01-2015 02:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thom4782 (Post 451990)
James

Did you use a sealed bearing when you replaced the IMSB?

I did. I researched bearings and found that "fully sealed" bearings are available. I chose a fully sealed high temp steel ball bearing. The grease, and more importantly the seal material (Viton) is upgraded in this bearing. In a fully sealed bearing the side shields touch the inner race.

Jake Raby 06-01-2015 05:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JFP in PA (Post 451873)
Not a matter of being critical, very few engines that have suffered an IMS failure make it with a replacement bearing and not being taken apart and cleaned; the odds against you are very high. You were quite fortunate, literally "one of the few"............

Therefore, this shouldn't even be attempted. If you do it, please use a competitors products, and make sure you post the failure pics after it fails again.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:03 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website