![]() |
Quote:
It's actually lighter and more powerful than the old model and the lightness is thanks to a shift to largely aluminium construction. So it's hard to argue that the engineering integrity isn't there. Personally, I think it's a natural progression from the 987 and a largely pretty impressive one even if I think the rear end is horrid and the electric steering a step too far. It's not for me, the 981, but they haven't jumped the sharp. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
The fact that the 991 S, stock, is quicker right out of the gate than a 997 GT3 tells you some big improvements have been made on the engineering side. The 981 front end is growing on me. A baby Ferrari California. Those gimicky doors and Panamera rear end not really. There was an interesting fan letter to the editor in Excellence from a San Francisco Porsche driver complaining about the lack of physical e-brake lever in the 991 for steep hill traffic light stops. The editor told him to brush up on his heel and toe. :p |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Anyway, you're flat wrong. If the new Boxster is attractive to buyers who normally like chintzed out, overweight, floppy 911 cabs, that says something about the changes they've made. And it's reasonable to conclude it's possible, perhaps likely, those changes won't be for the better if you like the Boxster because it's a great sports car. That's a very different rationale from liking a car because of its image. Pretty obvious, really. Surprised someone with such an imposing intellect, albeit hitherto entirely self-styled, could overlook this. |
Quote:
That said, it sounds as though you've spent exactly as much time driving 99X cabs as you have 981s, so I will attach equal weight to your well-formed opinions of each. Cheers! |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:27 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website