986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners

986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners (http://986forum.com/forums/index.php)
-   Boxster General Discussions (http://986forum.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=5)
-   -   IMS Upgrade - Should I have it done (http://986forum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=26567)

Jake Raby 10-25-2010 01:25 PM

IMS seal material is rubber, not magnetic.. To properly inspect for damaged bearings requires an extensive inspection of the oil filter element as well as the engine's oil sump plate.

Taking your chances on the IMS is certainly your choice. Lots of people have learned that hindsight is much more clear than 20/20. As long as you know that up front, you are making a well informed decision.

Steve Tinker 10-25-2010 06:58 PM

To check for engine debris, you need to cut open the old filter and flatten out the pleated paper element.
Metal particles are shiny and can be ferrous (magnetic) or aluminium (non-magnetic).
Black plastic can be from the IMS bearing seal / various plastic engine internals.
Browny red plastic can be from worn chain tensioners.
One guy found green plastic in his filter but the verdict was out (I think) on what the cause of that was.

Jim Miller 10-25-2010 07:35 PM

I found a local Porsche repair place "Ralf's Auto Repair" in Reisterstown MD, not sure if anyone knows them. Nice guy, he recommended changing the IMS bearing out and was aware of the LNengineering retrofit.

Should I also have the RMS replaced also? Anything else. Car has 32,000 miles (99).

ppbon 10-26-2010 06:07 AM

The IMS Bearing in a Boxster is like ...
 
... a man's prostate.
Give it enough time and it will develop cancer.

Even on engines that are driven very hard, with time they will fail.
Just like jake Raby, I've seen that "normal" daily drivers tend to fail sooner than later, but even engines with many, many track miles fail.
Mine was caught in time with 196,000 miles on it (22,000 were track miles).
When I pulled it the bearing was very worn and wobbly and would have failed in a few thousand more miles.

My recommendation to anyone how's worried is ... just do it.
You're purchasing peace of mind.
Once you retrofit, go have fun again.

Happy Boxstering,
Pedro

Jake Raby 10-26-2010 06:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jim Miller
I found a local Porsche repair place "Ralf's Auto Repair" in Reisterstown MD, not sure if anyone knows them. Nice guy, he recommended changing the IMS bearing out and was aware of the LNengineering retrofit.

Should I also have the RMS replaced also? Anything else. Car has 32,000 miles (99).

He can't be all that bad if he is current with the technology surrounding the IMS retrofit..

When you go "in" to the bellhouse area ALWAYS address the IMS, RMS and clutch. Even with 32K miles I'll bet that clutch disc it at least 50% worn.

Doing less just isn't smart. I don't allow people to make bad decisions, thats why my procedure goes all the way or not at all..

SoK 10-26-2010 08:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jim Miller
I found a local Porsche repair place "Ralf's Auto Repair" in Reisterstown MD, not sure if anyone knows them. Nice guy, he recommended changing the IMS bearing out and was aware of the LNengineering retrofit.

Should I also have the RMS replaced also? Anything else. Car has 32,000 miles (99).

Jim,

I just bought a 2001 Boxster with 42k miles last Wednesday, pristine in and out. It has a slight oil leak though, which I was aware of when purchasing and for which I paid the appropriate price. I'm taking it to the Cincinnati Porsche dealer Friday. Their rate is $1168.82 after tax to replace the IMS/RMS (most recent Porsche updates), oil/filter, full inspection/lubrication and a 2 year/24k mile powertrain warranty after the work is done. They're also giving me a rental for the 2 days they'll have the vehicle.

I priced out a warranty with a company I know of being in the insurance business, and the warranty alone on this car was $2400/year. I'm now paying half of that for at least a 4 or 5 year fix WITH a 2 year warranty.

Try calling a local Porsche dealer and see if you receive a similar number. I was very excited to hear this directly from the dealer.

jmatta 10-26-2010 08:35 AM

SoK, tell me you're not considering having Porsche replace the IMS bearing with the same old piece of junk? If you're going through the effort and expense, the LN update is the only logical solution and minimal difference in cost.

mikefocke 10-26-2010 08:55 AM

Too good to be true
 
SoK, that price doesn't make sense to me. The labor to remove and replace (R&R) the transmission to get at the bearings is almost as much as you are being quoted. To expect them to add a 2 year warranty on the entire engine for almost nothing more just doesn't strike me as consistent with the experiences and costs I've read about.

Nothing wrong with the Porsche-part RMS seal if it is the latest from Porsche.

Everything wrong with the IMS bearing and seal if it is from Porsche as none of their bearing/seal revisions have proven to not fail in a small percentage of cars and when they do fail they very often take the engine down with them to the point where a complete rebuild is necessary (assuming it is even still possible).

For the dealer to assume the risk of a new engine ($10k-$14k from Porsche) for peanuts doesn't make economic sense to me as a 2 year warranty alone is usually much more than your quote.

Call the dealer and at least ask him: Does the quote include both the Rear Main Seal and the IMS bearing and seal replacement? Parts and labor? Does it include an oil and oil filter change? What warranty do I get...on the work done or the entire engine? Who backs the warranty? Is it usable anywhere but at your dealership?

Good luck.

SoK 10-26-2010 10:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jmatta
SoK, tell me you're not considering having Porsche replace the IMS bearing with the same old piece of junk? If you're going through the effort and expense, the LN update is the only logical solution and minimal difference in cost.

Porsche no longer uses the same old junk they did in 2001, everything has been updated with the new iterations of the boxer engine.

Regardless of that, the theme I've gathered from this thread is that these IMS/RMS issues stem from a lack of use. My Boxster is a daily driver now, year round, so I don't expect the same issues from this parts this time around.

SoK 10-26-2010 10:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikefocke
SoK, that price doesn't make sense to me. The labor to remove and replace (R&R) the transmission to get at the bearings is almost as much as you are being quoted. To expect them to add a 2 year warranty on the entire engine for almost nothing more just doesn't strike me as consistent with the experiences and costs I've read about.

Nothing wrong with the Porsche-part RMS seal if it is the latest from Porsche.

Everything wrong with the IMS bearing and seal if it is from Porsche as none of their bearing/seal revisions have proven to not fail in a small percentage of cars and when they do fail they very often take the engine down with them to the point where a complete rebuild is necessary (assuming it is even still possible).

For the dealer to assume the risk of a new engine ($10k-$14k from Porsche) for peanuts doesn't make economic sense to me as a 2 year warranty alone is usually much more than your quote.

Call the dealer and at least ask him: Does the quote include both the Rear Main Seal and the IMS bearing and seal replacement? Parts and labor? Does it include an oil and oil filter change? What warranty do I get...on the work done or the entire engine? Who backs the warranty? Is it usable anywhere but at your dealership?

Good luck.

I did verify each and every one of those exact question's while I had them on the phone. The person in service I spoke with was familiar with the IMS/RMS issues, as well as the retrofits being done. That's why I jumped at the price as opposed to having you all do it. I want it done either way.

I'll be sure to post the work order up this weekend as they complete everything.

jmatta 10-26-2010 12:32 PM

"Porsche no longer uses the same old junk they did in 2001"

Not much better than the bearing used in 2001...I wouldn't consider anything other than the LN unit, unless you want to replace it every twenty five thousand miles and still take a chance of a premature failure. Seems as though they finally got the RMS correct.

Jim Miller 10-26-2010 01:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jake Raby
He can't be all that bad if he is current with the technology surrounding the IMS retrofit..

When you go "in" to the bellhouse area ALWAYS address the IMS, RMS and clutch. Even with 32K miles I'll bet that clutch disc it at least 50% worn.

Doing less just isn't smart. I don't allow people to make bad decisions, thats why my procedure goes all the way or not at all..


Jake, the guy knew who you were, your famous. Regarding the clutch, would you put a new one in if 50% worn. Why do they wear so fast. I have a 1989 325i with 140+ miles on it was only 50% worn when I had it taken apart have a transmission leak fixed.

Jake Raby 10-26-2010 02:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jim Miller
Jake, the guy knew who you were, your famous. Regarding the clutch, would you put a new one in if 50% worn. Why do they wear so fast. I have a 1989 325i with 140+ miles on it was only 50% worn when I had it taken apart have a transmission leak fixed.

Jim.... I am well known. Some love me. Some hate me. Most know me :-)

Be logical here.. If the clutch has 50% life gone, it only has 50% left, so that means you can do everything at once and pay get FREE LABOR to swap out the clutch now... OR in a couple of years you can spend another 1K to 1500 bucks to have the clutch replaced.

The last 50% of the disc wears faster than the first 50%. Do it all while you are there and it'll be 5+ years before you need to do anything to that part of the car.

JTP 10-26-2010 04:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ppbon
The IMS Bearing in a Boxster is like ...
... a man's prostate.

So getting a retrofit is like getting a prostate check: unpleasant, uncomfortable, but a necessary procedure when you're over 50.
If you don't get it addressed, a doctor's fist is going to be in there removing the cancer which is propably what a blown motor is going to feel like.
Pedro, thanks for the ANALogy!

mikefocke 10-26-2010 04:58 PM

Porsche has never
 
produced an IMS design for the Boxster that isn't know to fail. They continued to use an inner seal which fails and a bearing which is not the best. The combination continued to fail through three iterations as long as the IMS was used. And all Porsche supplied replacement parts will use the same known to fail IMS design.

I'm not saying all will fail this year, but a certain small percentage will. And next year the same. Etc. Until the percentage of engines with failures starts to accumulate to a noticeable number.

Good luck Sok

SoK 10-26-2010 04:58 PM

What are the pro's and con's to the updated Porsche OEM IMS bearing vs. the LN unit? What are the major differences?

I really appreciate all the help, I'm still very new to these cars.

Quote:

Originally Posted by jmatta
"Porsche no longer uses the same old junk they did in 2001"

Not much better than the bearing used in 2001...I wouldn't consider anything other than the LN unit, unless you want to replace it every twenty five thousand miles and still take a chance of a premature failure. Seems as though they finally got the RMS correct.


SoK 10-26-2010 05:03 PM

You answered me before I posted lol.. It seems like the retrofit is only a temporary fix from what I'm reading. I thought I read it's good practice to replace that every 5 or so years, just as it would be standard practice to replace the OEM IMS bearing.

My stock bearing is going on 10 years (though I obviously don't know it's condition). If we're being quoted to replace the retrofit around 5 or 6, what's the difference (aside from cost and supporting a community sponsor) in going through Porsche for this particular bit of maintenance, especially when they back it up for 2 years/24k miles?

Thanks again

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikefocke
produced an IMS design for the Boxster that isn't know to fail. They continued to use an inner seal which fails and a bearing which is not the best. The combination continued to fail through three iterations as long as the IMS was used. And all Porsche supplied replacement parts will use the same known to fail IMS design.

I'm not saying all will fail this year, but a certain small percentage will. And next year the same. Etc. Until the percentage of engines with failures starts to accumulate to a noticeable number.

Good luck Sok


Steve Tinker 10-26-2010 05:05 PM

Jim, regarding your clutch, replacing it when the IMS / RMS is exposed really makes economic sense. The clutch plates may well be only 50% worn, but that's only one part of the clutch assembly - you still have to think about the release bearing wear and fingers breaking. If you change it out now, there is also a very good chance that your flywheel is still servicable too - which saves another $1,000 in replacement costs
Only a month ago I had the LN bearing and new RMS replaced with a new clutch kit. The clutch was original with 47,000 miles on it and the linings were +/- 50% worn. But the release bearing was shot - loose and rattly.
The new clutch action is far superior in feel and takeup - and the best thing is that I don't have to worry about any of it for the next 50,000 miles :)

stuklr 10-26-2010 05:30 PM

Jake, Just a quick question having to do with the IMS. Are all the metal particles they shave off while failing ferrous? Can i drag a magnet across my oil filter when changing and detect bearing material or just watch for shiny stuff?

Jake Raby 10-26-2010 05:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stuklr
Jake, Just a quick question having to do with the IMS. Are all the metal particles they shave off while failing ferrous? Can i drag a magnet across my oil filter when changing and detect bearing material or just watch for shiny stuff?

If the bearing gets that far, the engine is pretty much toast in most instances.

stuklr 10-26-2010 06:13 PM

Thanks Jake. Just thought I would ask. I have been listening to the IMS bearing area on my 2000 S for the last 5k miles with a stethoscope. I just purchased the car and it is always difficult to tell a bearing noise from the timing chain moving across the sprockets. The noise hasn't changed after two autocross events and daily driving for those 5k miles. Gathering a new clutch and will be giving you a call to get a bearing and puller soon for piece of mind anyway.

Thanks for developing products to hopefully avoid a possible issue these engines have. I will keep autocrossing and using my porsche like it was intended. 78k and climbing. Have anything against shell rotella synthetic oils? I use it in my turbo 5-cylinder audi and it keeps it nice and clean. Think it will agree with this flat 6?

cnavarro 10-27-2010 05:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SoK
What are the pro's and con's to the updated Porsche OEM IMS bearing vs. the LN unit? What are the major differences?

There is no OEM IMS bearing available from Porsche. What the dealership quoted you was probably a flange reseal, which consists of replacing the seal on the IMS flange - that's why the job looked so cheap. That's it.

There is no part number associated with anything IMS related other than a complete IMS assembly (complete shaft, 3rd revision) OR the flange, seal, and nut. Bearing and bearing support (stud) don't have part numbers, as they were never intended to be replaced.

Jim Miller 10-28-2010 04:13 AM

Can someone educate me on what the roll of the intermediate shaft is or point me to a good link to how the engine is designed.

mts 10-28-2010 05:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jim Miller
Can someone educate me on what the roll of the intermediate shaft is or point me to a good link to how the engine is designed.

http://www.pelicanparts.com/techarticles/Boxster_Tech/14-ENGINE-Intermediate_Shaft_Bearing/14-ENGINE-Intermediate_Shaft_Bearing.htm

There is also a very good series of articles on it in Excellence Magazine, I think June, July & August of 2010.

Ckrikos 10-28-2010 05:07 PM

After reading the pelican article all it seems one needs to do is check the oil pan during each oil change. If you see metal get the car checked out.

mts 10-29-2010 03:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ckrikos
After reading the pelican article all it seems one needs to do is check the oil pan during each oil change. If you see metal get the car checked out.

Once it gets to that point I think you are toast....or at least the motor needs to be torn down in addition to an IMS replacement. Metal floating around in the motor = not good.

Jim Miller 11-01-2010 07:55 PM

Well the car is in the shop, got my fingers crossed that the retrofit goes well. :dance:

djw8282 11-02-2010 08:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jim Miller
I understand the need for oil changes and driving in the proper RPM range but I don't see the benefit of driving the car hard. Seems like the driving hard will diminish life.

Hey Jim.. I have driven my 2002 S from brand new..I racked up 92k miles in 8yrs by absolutely driving it like I stole it from day one. This car has been driven in all types of weather including snow. I also had a 99' that I drove in the same manner..I put 36k before getting the S. I had no engine problems with either car!

mikefocke 11-03-2010 03:59 AM

A sample of one is a pretty small sample
 
and that is what so many of us have to judge from. If it happens to you, it's common. If it hasn't, it must not be. And if it didn't, then your way of doing things must be right.

Somehow my statistics professor would laugh at our drawing conclusions that way but we all do it.

(And my sample of 2 isn't much better!)

eightsandaces 11-03-2010 04:35 AM

How's this for the professor: Common enough to cause the Porsche factory to support a replacement program as well as IMS replacement specialists as a sub business but not common enough for a consumer recall class action lawsuit.

Seems like every Porsche engine I have owned was spinning some power robbing Jimmything you wish it wasn't, last time it was the anti vibration counter balancer.

Jim Miller 11-06-2010 05:22 AM

Well, the bearing is replaced. First of all the guy who did it, Ralph at Ralph's auto service in Owings Mills, MD said the people at LNengineer were the nicest an most helpful people he has ever dealt with.

He said the procedure went very well. And now for the drum roll. He said the bear looked fine (double row) and turned smooth. He agreed it was better to find it in good shape than in some other condition. While in there he replace the RMS and since the clutch was 2/3 spent I had him replace it also.

I'm overall glad I had it done. So, I'm good to go. I now plan to drive this thing as a good weather daily driver and enjoy. :cheers:

mikefocke 11-06-2010 08:11 AM

And the bad news is
 
you get it back just as the weather turns and you have to begin to look at road surface temperatures and the kind of tires you are driving on. 40F is the critical number if you have summer tires!

Freeze warnings tonight in mid-NC the day after I washed the car in my shorts.

extanker 11-06-2010 08:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikefocke
you get it back just as the weather turns and you have to begin to look at road surface temperatures and the kind of tires you are driving on. 40F is the critical number if you have summer tires!

Freeze warnings tonight in mid-NC the day after I washed the car in my shorts.

whats your car doin in your shorts ? :rolleyes:

SoK 11-06-2010 10:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jim Miller
Well, the bearing is replaced. First of all the guy who did it, Ralph at Ralph's auto service in Owings Mills, MD said the people at LNengineer were the nicest an most helpful people he has ever dealt with.

He said the procedure went very well. And now for the drum roll. He said the bear looked fine (double row) and turned smooth. He agreed it was better to find it in good shape than in some other condition. While in there he replace the RMS and since the clutch was 2/3 spent I had him replace it also.

I'm overall glad I had it done. So, I'm good to go. I now plan to drive this thing as a good weather daily driver and enjoy. :cheers:

Pretty much the exact same news I heard back from Porsche on mine. Bearing looked perfectly fine, had them redo the seals, clutch stayed in as it was > 50% good (I'll have it replaced in a couple of years, having the AOS and water pump done next year around this time), replaced a couple of spark plug o-rings, the oil filler tube, did an oil change and basically went over the car with a fine tooth comb looking for anything that needed work. The car passed with flying colors so I'm very pleased I pulled the trigger on this Box!

Steve Tinker 11-06-2010 08:36 PM

Isn't it great to hear a few good tales about the infamous IMS now and again.......

So, in the last month that's 3 IMS assemblies (mine, Sok and now Jim Miller) that have been replaced and found the old unit still servicable.

I guess Mike Focke's statistics prof won't like a sample of 3, but its a hell of a lot better that adding them to the 4 that Jake Raby had delivered to his forecourt earlier this week........

Pinarelloman 11-09-2010 09:16 AM

I too, have been worried about possible motor implosion and the associated costs of repair or replacement. As of yesterday my car has been dropped off for a new clutch assembly & IMS replacement. Should be back in a few days & will let you know if mine was good or otherwise.
The guys doing the work just replaced the IMS in a 2001 with 60000KM and the hardening was worn of the bearings...very lucky.

Ray 11-10-2010 04:33 PM

Wondering about the "new" engine:

My car was built in Finland at the tail end of 98'. I had the infamous catastrophic engine failure at about 8k miles. This would have been in the 2002 time frame. Is there any way I can determine what engine I had mine replaced with? And, most importantly, is my IMS 'more' at risk, still?

clickman 11-10-2010 07:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ray
Wondering about the "new" engine:

My car was built in Finland at the tail end of 98'. I had the infamous catastrophic engine failure at about 8k miles. This would have been in the 2002 time frame. Is there any way I can determine what engine I had mine replaced with? And, most importantly, is my IMS 'more' at risk, still?

Apparently all engines up to the new generation (MY2010?), where there is no IMS, are subject to the same problem.

Pinarelloman 11-11-2010 09:30 PM

OK, I have my car back.
2001 Boxster S 66,000km. Had a dual row bearing.
Dual mass flywheel was U/S, had 20mm movement. Clutch face about 50% worn, thrust bearing OK. All now replaced. IMS replaced with LN unit.
A few observations, clutch action alot lighter, timing chain rattle on startup now gone.
Total price $4699 AUD.
While alot of $$ it gives me peace of mind that there is one less thing to go wrong.

Jim Miller 11-12-2010 05:42 PM

Picked up my car after new IMS, RMS and clutch. Enjoyed driving it home and parked it in the driveway. Moved it to the garage and noticed I was leaking oil. Bummed. Goes back to the shop tomorrow morning. I just want to get out and drive this thing.

Still glad I replaced the IMS but the car didn't leak oil before I had the work done.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:29 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website