![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Here is what I've done in five years of tracking a my car starting with the original 2.7 motor. I can say for some time I've run almost every configuration of air intake on track and have hours of data recording to back them up. In the 2.7 with an smooth 3-1/4" inlet pipe upgrade plenum and 74mm throttle body stock MAF stock air box desnorkled. My recorded improvement is 19-20 HP The next year I ran a Agency power box with a cone filter a SLIGHT improvement. The next year I had the 987 box stock MAF. The rest was the same as above. I had "NO" improvement in HP or Torque. But I wasted an entire weekend getting it installed IHAVE NO PROBLEM SAYING IT WAS JERRY RIGGED. I could only get 2 bolts in it was cockeyed high in the front low in the back and towards the motor in the rear. Using your prices the straight pipe throttle body and plenum would have been $170 without 4-6hours removing the intake injectors and all the other crap. This is a fact I can say the 987 air box never was installed right until I removed the 2.7 motor to install the 3.2/3.6 conversion. It's flush to the cover now the flange had vibrated against the top spot Brad had previously mentioned and made a flat spot that was nearly through. It was bad enough I bought another one. |
Quote:
It's also a known fact that Porsche put the smaller air box on the 986 to keep it's performance down. They cut the nuts off the 986 with that air box. Quote:
|
Quote:
$170 to get 20 HP increase, hands down the best bang mod for the money. Really makes the UPD for $200 and 5 HP gain look even more silly. I've always estimated I got a 20 HP increase, but always felt is was more. My brother who has taken many rides and driven my Boxster before the intake and air box upgrade. I took him for a ride after the upgrade and also let him drive it. I then told him about the header, cat delete pipe, Borla muffler, 987 MAF house and larger intake pipping with a tune plans. His exact words were. "Your car is too fast right now, you don't need to do those upgrades". He is 6'-3" at 260lbs, even with the extra weight of him in the car, his impression was the car is too fast already. |
For those in the know then, should I look for certain year 987 intake 997 distribution T, and 996 TB? Same for every year? I'd like to start gathering all parts. Thanks.
|
987 air box are all the same. When looking for the 996 Throttle Body, make sure it came off a 996 model number 99660511501, some people will list them for a 996 and they came off a Boxster. The 997 Distribution T make sure you get one that looks like the one I linked to, the turbo models are different. You probably can't beat that price.
You could also look for a 997 TB model number 99760511501. |
Anyone see gains on a 2.5, or is the stock air box 'right sized' for the smaller motor?
|
Quote:
TechnoPower Kit You can have this guy bore your TB and do your own thing for the rest of the air intake system. http://www.maxbore.com/pictures.html |
Bang for buck mod
Kram, Did you end up shaving off the top of the 997 -T for clearance? I recall you expressing earlier in another thread of a thick ridge hitting starter.
|
Quote:
http://i60.tinypic.com/vdjz2s.jpg Just talked with the man at Softronic. He said using the larger 987 MAF Housing will yield no gain with the 996 TB, is could also hurt the cars performance even with a tune. He also said do not go to a larger TB, like a 82mm TB on a stock 3.2L engine (no internal engine changes). It will actually hurt the cars low end performance. The 996 TB he says is what to go with and stick to the 986 MAF housing. So all I have to do now is get my exhaust upgrades done, forget the larger 987 MAF housing. I will be getting a tune from Softronic as I want every bit of HP I can get out of this engine. |
Bang for buck mod
Thanks, Thats nice to know we are utilizing the best combo of parts to up our ponies. And I hope you don't mind one more question. Just for clarity, for our 987 intake the only needed part is the unit and flat snorkel? I was concerned about the small rubber elbow for Maf to air but I don't need either.correct? Thanks,
|
Quote:
no gain? not likely. most likely no gain for softronic. you've been upsold. instead of 1/2 hour at your indy getting the spyder tune pushed onto your car, now you're out $800 to ... softronic. |
Quote:
I called two indy shops and neither could push a 550 Special Edition into my car as they do not have the tune. I asked how much they would charge to push the tune if I got it, $800 to push a tune. At least with Softronic you get the Durametric cable which will work on your car with Durametric software. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
wiki lists the 2003/04 as 258 and the 550 as 266 - that's 8 hp increase. as i've stated previously (in this thread, for example) the role of the intake mod is to go from a reducing diameter intake designed to accelerate the air and benefit low rpm power (your "around town drivebility") to an intake that works better at high rpm because it flows more air by reducing the amount of restriction (accelerating air takes work). so, either have an oem reducing diameter intake (did you notice that the oem air pipe on your car is a smaller diameter at the tb than at the maf housing? that the tb is 2.7" ID and the maf housing is 3" ID? - that's reducing diameter - as the air gets drawn in it has to either compress or accelerate as the amount of space available decreases - this accelerating air rushes into the cylinder and increases power. works good when the engine needs help breathing, but just gets in the way when the egnine is trying to breath hard) or mod your intake to move as much air as possible. putting on a big tb, big plenum, and big airbox, then leaving a restrictive pipe in the middle, does neither - it slows the air down instead of accelerating it, and it serves as a restriction to airflow. if you already have the big tb, big plenum and big airbox, then you are already expeneincing any loss of low rpm power you are going to experience - not much, is it? changing that one pipe sitting by your airbox is not going to reduce the amount of hp your car makes. it took me 5 minutes with a pirate porsche pst2 to do my row flash. it is not an $800 job. the mechanics you checked with probably don't have the tool and are quoting you softronic, giac, pedro, or one of the others. |
Quote:
Special Edition BoxsterŽ S Celebrates 50 Years of the 550 Spyder "For added performance, the new Boxster S edition is equipped with the most powerful engine ever offered in the Boxster model line. Rated at 264 horsepower (SAE)" Yes I am looking to increase the size of the piping between the MAF housing and TB. Was looking on eBay earlier today looking for some 74mm I/D pipping. Right now with the stock piping the car has no normal driving issues and when you drop the throttle, she goes like stink. I don't know how the larger piping is going to effect the car's drivability, but once I get it done, I'll share the information. Bottom line is, the 987 MAF housing is a zero gain using the 996 TB. If a person wanted to use the 987 MAF housing, he would want to use the 82mm TB, but you would need valve work done to the heads. The stock motor just can not take in the extra air without internal engine mods. 996 TB with the 986 MAF house is largest you would want to go on a stock 3.2L, your power band is perfect with that setup, no normal driving issues and will suck all the air she can at WOT. |
Got the larger pipe ordered, but it's coming out of China and had to order a fitting for the Tiptronic venturi tube from China too, then will have to have the fitting welded onto the pipe. So it will be a bit before I have any feedback on that.
|
Kram, Need another clarification, on the Honeycomb 75mm for Maf they come in different ratios for cells. Remember which one? Seems default on website is 4:1 ratio. Gathered most parts and getting jazzed!
|
The real problem isn't the 987 MAF or the 996, 76mm throttle body. It the stock 996 Plenum. There is a lot of engineering data some in this post.
http://986forum.com/forums/general-discussions/31693-maf-throttle-body-diameter-10.html That discuss the problem, which is the Plenum design that create a massive turbulent blockage. Then a spin off where a members was designing a retro plenum, very similar to IPD's design. I don't know where this led after the thread died. http://986forum.com/forums/diy-project-guides/55966-intake-plenum-911-throttle-body-4.html The IPD does make this transition but the price is somewhat objectionable to some members. |
Pipe
KRAM36 where did you order the larger pipe from and what size was it?
I to am wondering if the larger diameter exhaust pipe will give me a pick up in HP and still provide enough back pressure. My CAT by pass is 40mm. |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:16 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website