Go Back   986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners > Porsche Boxster & Cayman Forums > Performance and Technical Chat

Post Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-21-2007, 05:17 PM   #1
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: new jersey
Posts: 404
you bought it brand new? i can get one used for 15.00 .. you think i should go for it
clb0099 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2007, 05:26 PM   #2
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 3,417
Send a message via AIM to blinkwatt
Stick to the OEM paper filter. K & N filter cost me $240 for a new MAF.
__________________
-99' Zenith Blue 5-spd...didn't agree with a center divider on the freeway
-01' S Orient Red Metallic 6-spd...money pit...sold to buy a house
blinkwatt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2007, 05:27 PM   #3
blkboxster
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by clb0099
you bought it brand new? i can get one used for 15.00 .. you think i should go for it
i got my new for $35.00 on ebay.i wouldn't get a used.but yeah go for it
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2007, 05:35 PM   #4
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: new jersey
Posts: 404
well there is not difference between the new one or used one. Cause once i get the cleaner kit it all the same.
clb0099 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2007, 05:40 PM   #5
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Ontario Canada
Posts: 136
Send a message via MSN to Darkhamr
Well the Box is not the only car that has had a MAF destroyed by the filter oil, but it's still a great filter just make sure it doesn't have excess oil. Blow it off before installing.
Darkhamr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2007, 07:01 PM   #6
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 283
Quote:
Originally Posted by Darkhamr
Well the Box is not the only car that has had a MAF destroyed by the filter oil, but it's still a great filter just make sure it doesn't have excess oil. Blow it off before installing.
How do you know its a "great" filter? Compared to what? What perceived benefits do you believe you have achieved by adding this filter to your car?

Just curious...
__________________
2000 Porsche Boxster S
2007 Lexus RX350
xclusivecar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2007, 08:07 PM   #7
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Illinois
Posts: 3,033
I've had a B&M filter which is basically an expensive K&N for the last 3 yrs with absolutley no issues.
__________________
'03 3.2L GuardsRed/Blk/Blk---6Spd
Options: Litronics, 18" Carrera lights, Bose sound, Painted to match roll bars.
http://i100.photobucket.com/albums/m...Mautocross.jpg
Adam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2007, 08:26 PM   #8
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Ontario Canada
Posts: 136
Send a message via MSN to Darkhamr
Quote:
Originally Posted by xclusivecar
How do you know its a "great" filter? Compared to what? What perceived benefits do you believe you have achieved by adding this filter to your car?

Just curious...
Hey, I appreciate someone challenging 'opinion' based claims on the internet. I should have stated why. Here is why I made that statement. I elevate a couple of factors above others when considering a filter. For my performance vehicles flow rate is my number one consideration and as such gauze flows more than any other types. Whether you can utilize that difference in your particular setup is another matter. Most OEM intake setups will not benefit from changing from paper. Next is that I like my filters to be kept very clean, so paper filters I replace quite often where as the K&N I can wash and reuse and is more cost effective to me. Finally I like the build quality as many OEM types I've used have crushed and lost shape quickly. I'm sure it doesn't filter as well hence the requirement for oiling, but that doesn't play into my considerations.

Flow Tests

http://www.mkiv.com/techarticles/filters_test/2/
Darkhamr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2007, 09:01 PM   #9
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota, USA
Posts: 3,308
Hi,

You make many points, both pro and con, in the argument. The K&N and other gauze-type filters may supply more flow, but at the expense of more grit entering the engine (and consequently the Oil). If that doesn't matter to you (as it doesn't with a Race Engine), then further discussion is moot.

But, consider that in ISO 5011 tests - http://www.billswebspace.com/AirFilterTest.htm , the gauze-type filters, especially the K&N, repeatedly clogged in ⅓ the time of a conventional paper filter, negating any initial gains pretty quickly.

As you profess an obsession with keeping your filters clean, this wouldn't especially matter. But, for many who don't share this obsession, the gains experienced by a switch are very short-term, and will actually result in a negative sum gain through the service life of the filter. Also, realize and consider that the longer a filter is in service, the better it actually filters (but at the expense of increased restriction) as the already trapped particles restrict the size of the pores or openings even further.

But, for many, who are not concerned primarily with flow, nor obsessed by cleaning the filter continuously to insure this, the K&N and other gauze-type filters aren't a good thing. To say nothing of the expense of a shortened Oil Change interval, and potential premature MAF failure. Except for bragging at the Bar, I see little benefit, but lots of negatives.

K&N in particular uses the allure of Marketing and gains out of context to increase their sales. They're not really concerned about the negative effects it can have on you car longterm, nor do they tell the whole story. Similar to what STP did in the '60s and '70s.

If they were so great in a street application, why doesn't a single manufacturer offer them, even as an option where they could mark-up the hell out of the thing?

I do use a gauze-type filter on my Formula VEE for maximum flow (especially since the filter is only there just to keep rocks out of the intakes), since regular Oil changes and rebuilds are already part of the deal anyway. But, on my Street Cars, I stick with the OEM paper filters...

Happy Motoring!... Jim'99

Last edited by MNBoxster; 02-22-2007 at 10:25 AM.
MNBoxster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2007, 09:29 PM   #10
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NYC area
Posts: 681
What does re-oiling require? What exactly do you re-oil with? Thanks
__________________
Miss my Boxster
Bavarian Motorist is offline   Reply With Quote
Post Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:32 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page