986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners

986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners (http://986forum.com/forums/)
-   Performance and Technical Chat (http://986forum.com/forums/performance-technical-chat/)
-   -   987 v 986 Air box (http://986forum.com/forums/performance-technical-chat/32074-987-v-986-air-box.html)

Frank A 01-13-2013 10:24 AM

I have been following this post for a while now and it is a very tempting mod. I have a 2000 boxster S 6 speed and was hoping to get some direction from those of you who have done this. I recently acquired a 2007 cayman S diverter T and throttle body and would like to build from there. I have a few questions perhaps some of you could shed lite on.

1- What do I use for a vacuum signal for the flap in the T
2- do I continue sourcing the rest of the 2007 cayman S intake, MAF, and air box
3-From what I gather from the post, I use the maf sensor from my old setup installed in the cayman s MAF tube and my DME will adapt, if not will the X-51 flash help.

Thanks for your knowlege and advice
Frank

The Radium King 01-13-2013 10:35 AM

1. i *think* you should be able to take the vacuum signal that drives the resonance flap on your intake and use it. if you look at your intake there are two tubes that join the two sides together - the diverter 't' and the resonance tube. on the resonance tube there is a vacuum-driven flapper valve. 't' off this vacuum signal to drive the flapper on your diverter.

2. personally, i would just connect the new diverter/throttle body to your existing airbox/maf housing to start. this way your car can work with it's original tune and you can see if you get any performance improvements, if the flapper in your diverter is working, etc.

3. if you do go to the cayman airbox, you can saw-off the maf housing on your original airbox and plumb it into the system, or you can use the cayman maf housing and see if your ecu will adapt, or you can push a 996 tune onto your car (designed for the larger maf housing). only the first is certain to work; i've not heard with any certainty that the other two will work.

berty987 02-17-2013 11:08 AM

The 987 and 986 have different ECU programmes (and ECU's) , even though they share the same heads and much of the internal engine parts. If you fit a 987 inlet plenum T its supposed to modulate independently from the cross flap that is in the other link tube between the inlet manifolds. Unless you get a custom ECU I cant see how you could get the plenum T to modulate correctly , so it may be better to simply fit the T without any control. I also suspect that the variocam on the inlet also adjusts based on the plenum T as would possibly ignition and fuelling. Assuming you are fitting the airbox as a performance modification, it may also be better to fit a cayman / post 2006 boxster plenum T rather than the earlier 987 boxster 3.2 model. The later model plenum used on the M97 engine uses the same airbox but has a larger throttle body ( 76mm rather than 68mm diameter). I would still sugest this is fitted without the vacuum control or if possible with a 996 3.6 manifold T which doesnt have the internal flap control. If you fit either the M97 76mm plenum or the 996 3.6 item you need to also fit silicone reducers to mate the T to the inlet manifold on each side as the diameters are about 10mm different. There is a write up on planet 9 under the articles section and a few posts on 996 plenum tees into 986 boxsters under the tuning part of the forum. Hope this helps.

jaykay 02-17-2013 08:21 PM

I would also be concerned as to where the flap is flapping without controls attached to it.

Frank A 02-18-2013 09:31 PM

:DI have the complete set up from a 2007 cayman S, Air Box to intake T. Still doing my homework on this, just trying to lay out my options before I do the install. I'm busy with school rite now and I have suspension upgrades planed for spring break so this project is on the back burner until I can more info on the update. My main concern about this is the MAF and what I may need in the way of programing in order to benefit from more air. I would like to take advantage of the flap in the intake t for low end torque. If the intake flap is actuated with the variocam I may try hijacking the signal from the variocam solenoid relay to actuate a relay for the additional vacuum solenoid. I may put it off until I can get some head work done. I recently saw a post on the Pelican Bord from someone who had adapters made to use the cayman S intake manifold on 996 heads.

In case you can't tell I got a real bad case of cant leave well enough alone!:cool:

Brad Roberts 02-18-2013 11:47 PM

I make adapters to install the CaymanS intake on *any* of the 9X6 heads. The guy who *probably* posted on PP was a guy out of San Antonio we did a set for.

jaykay 02-19-2013 11:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frank A (Post 328179)
:DI have the complete set up from a 2007 cayman S, Air Box to intake T. Still doing my homework on this, just trying to lay out my options before I do the install. I'm busy with school rite now and I have suspension upgrades planed for spring break so this project is on the back burner until I can more info on the update. My main concern about this is the MAF and what I may need in the way of programing in order to benefit from more air. I would like to take advantage of the flap in the intake t for low end torque. If the intake flap is actuated with the variocam I may try hijacking the signal from the variocam solenoid relay to actuate a relay for the additional vacuum solenoid. I may put it off until I can get some head work done. I recently saw a post on the Pelican Bord from someone who had adapters made to use the cayman S intake manifold on 996 heads.

In case you can't tell I got a real bad case of cant leave well enough alone!:cool:

I intend on manufacturing a press fit sleeve for the 987 MAF housing. To bring it down to where the 986 tune can work with air flow. This diameter nicely matches the dia of the 987 74mm tb. This way I avoid custom programming issues

The 987 T flap is vacum operated. It may be that the vario cam change overs their signals could be made to run the flap and work but I fear you will get snap change in flap position as the cams phase (2500 rpm ?). Maybe this is okay as this a coast cruise rpm but if the phasing occurs at (4000rpm) you could be in the middle of a corner when you get cams and flap changing.....whomp!

The 987 would have vario cam plus which is gradual.

Sounds interesting let us know how you make out!

Frank A 02-19-2013 11:45 AM

The rate at which the flap opens can be regulated by the diameter of the vacuum line that feeds the flap bellows, larger diameter more volume transfer the faster the valve opens. The vacuum canister should have more than enough capacity to handle this. The plastic lines used currently have a 1mm I.D the combination of the small diameter and the volume air needed to actuate these devices does two things, regulates the time between normal and activated state, and lessens the affect of pressure pulses creating pulsed transition from normal to to actuated.
Besides I have always been a fan of a 2 stroke like power curve, just as long as it is consistent. And I'm the only driver on this buss!

jaykay 02-19-2013 11:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frank A (Post 328230)
The rate at which the flap opens can be regulated by the diameter of the vacuum line that feeds the flap bellows, larger diameter more volume transfer the faster the valve opens. The vacuum canister should have more than enough capacity to handle this. The plastic lines used currently have a 1mm I.D the combination of the small diameter and the volume air needed to actuate these devices does two things, regulates the time between normal and activated state, and lessens the affect of pressure pulses creating pulsed transition from normal to to actuated.
Besides I have always been a fan of a 2 stroke like power curve, just as long as it is consistent. And I'm the only driver on this buss!

Yes. True I didn't think about the line size and diaphragm diameter...could be okay!

Hey I rode ported and polished RZ-350 for 7 years so I hear yah!

BYprodriver 03-29-2013 08:04 AM

Finally got the 987 airbox & maf tube in & made a hose to connect to 997 plenum & 74mm T/B. Hard to see much of the hose, maybe I can get a better pic on a sunny day. My engine is 3.6L so runs very lean unless maf is disconnected then it runs ok just a little rich. Next is the 996 flash. http://986forum.com/forums/uploads01...1364573022.jpg

The Radium King 03-29-2013 08:43 AM

just thinking a bit here: anyone try to push a 996 flash onto a 3.2 986 that has the larger cayman maf housing? ie, do what you've done but to a 3.2? would really allow you to reduce restrictions in the intake tract, but the maps might be off for the smaller displacement (maf reading would be correct so afrs should be ok)? is there a special flash for the 2004 anniversary edition that had the 3.2 with larger maf housing?

The Radium King 03-29-2013 02:33 PM

I guess an 04 anniversary edition tune wouldn't work as it's a 7.8 dme. still, a 996 tune *might* work - afr's would be fine, maf readings would be fine with a cayman maf housing. I think it would just be a question of the maps being able to deal with the fact that the rpms wouldn't correlate to the amount of air (3.2 vs 3.4 displacement) but I think that there must be enough room in the maps for this, otherwise lne wouldn't be able to say that a 3.6 bore works fine with the oem 3.2 tune (same thing only in reverse).

so, we need someone with a 3.2 to put a cayman airbox and maf housing in their car and push a 3.4 996 tune onto it and see if it runs ...

onaFLYer 03-30-2013 01:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Radium King (Post 334092)

so, we need someone with a 3.2 to put a cayman airbox and maf housing in their car and push a 3.4 996 tune onto it and see if it runs ...

That is my most recent plan for my car...though it is not a 3.2 anymore. We tried some updated tunes awhile back to no avail. Currently running an updated stock tune which is better than it was, just not great. Having the car on the road for over a year now, and dealing with various issues from the beginning I'm ready to once again try and make it right. Looking at putting the IPD plenum and a 987 TB on it too.

Will report back once the 996 tune is tried.

BYprodriver 03-31-2013 10:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Radium King (Post 334092)
I guess an 04 anniversary edition tune wouldn't work as it's a 7.8 dme. still, a 996 tune *might* work - afr's would be fine, maf readings would be fine with a cayman maf housing. I think it would just be a question of the maps being able to deal with the fact that the rpms wouldn't correlate to the amount of air (3.2 vs 3.4 displacement) but I think that there must be enough room in the maps for this, otherwise lne wouldn't be able to say that a 3.6 bore works fine with the oem 3.2 tune (same thing only in reverse).

so, we need someone with a 3.2 to put a cayman airbox and maf housing in their car and push a 3.4 996 tune onto it and see if it runs ...

I think it would run ok just possibly a little too much cam too early due to the 996 timing. I would have to compare the cam timing differences.

BYprodriver 03-31-2013 10:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BYprodriver (Post 334045)
Finally got the 987 airbox & maf tube in & made a hose to connect to 997 plenum & 74mm T/B. Hard to see much of the hose, maybe I can get a better pic on a sunny day. My engine is 3.6L so runs very lean unless maf is disconnected then it runs ok just a little rich. Next is the 996 flash. http://986forum.com/forums/uploads01...1364573022.jpg

996 flash works great for the 3.6L, I was surprised how much power this combo added! The intake roar is startling! New dyno test coming. :D

Meir 03-31-2013 03:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BYprodriver (Post 334339)
996 flash works great for the 3.6L, I was surprised how much power this combo added! The intake roar is startling! New dyno test coming. :D

Who did the 996 flush for you if I may ask?

BYprodriver 03-31-2013 08:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Meir (Post 334385)
Who did the 996 flush for you if I may ask?

I did with my PST2

Bfan 04-02-2013 12:40 PM

I am impressed. You are the man BYprodriver. Respect, respect

Meir 04-02-2013 01:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BYprodriver (Post 334433)
I did with my PST2

good to know you have one :D

Paul 04-02-2013 06:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BYprodriver (Post 334433)
I did with my PST2

When I reflashed mine, I got to see some of Porsche's humor while the download was taking place:

http://i33.photobucket.com/albums/d6...t/P5010294.jpg


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:53 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website