![]() |
Interesting results from the track yesterday
Yesterday was the first time I had the Boxster on a track that I had previously driven my former 99.5 A4 on. I was really looking forward to seeing how the two cars compared.
My best with the A4 was 1:51.0 My best with the Boxster was 1:54.2 I'm sure I can get the Boxster down another few tenths, but that's probably about the limit of my capabilities. I was hoping the two would be about the same time. I guess the turbo (altitude), quattro, r-comps and +55 tq more than made up for the A4's balance and extra 200 pounds. I think if the tires were the same on both cars the times would be very similar. The A4 had RA1s and the Boxster is on RE050As. |
Quote:
|
Hey Pat,
Did you run around HPR, or one of the other tracks? And yes, the Boxster is heavily affected by the altitude, in comparison to a car with a turbo. Adding in the AWD, and everything else, I can easily see an A4 outpacing a Boxster up here at 5k+ feet. BC. |
We were at Pueblo yesterday.
|
R-comp tires will reveal your lost 3 seconds. A more open course should favor the Audi while a more technical course should favor the Box.
|
After thinking more about it, I bet I could knock a second or so off that time with some practice. For you local guys, what should I expect a stock 986 S to do around Pueblo?
|
Unfortunately, I've only ever driven my '98 on HPR, so I don't have an idea what it might do at Pueblo.
BC. |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:50 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website