986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners

986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners (http://986forum.com/forums/)
-   Performance and Technical Chat (http://986forum.com/forums/performance-technical-chat/)
-   -   update on exhaust issues... can anyone help? (http://986forum.com/forums/performance-technical-chat/16473-update-exhaust-issues-can-anyone-help.html)

mn box s 04-24-2008 07:19 PM

update on exhaust issues... can anyone help?
 
Some of you have read my other posts about my exhaust. I think I'm getting close to solving, I have a new check code. My exhaust is on a 00' S, set-up is Che's headers, Fabspeed test pipes, Che's exhaust. Yes that means I have no cats. Che sent me 02 sensor cheaters... the ones that back the 02s out of the exhaust pipe. The rear sensors I just plugged in and zip tied them up and out of the way. The 02s are new so is my maf. The check code is now p1115. Something about pre heating the 02s? :confused: Help me please. and thank you.

j.fro 04-25-2008 03:24 AM

You may have a bad O2 Sensor. You can check this by switching them (move left one to the right, and right to the left). Clear the codes, and go for a drive. If you get a CEL with a 1119 code, then it's the sensor. 1119 is the same code as the 1115, just for the other side.

mn box s 04-25-2008 04:04 AM

front? rear? or both?

derb 04-25-2008 06:02 AM

I currently have a similar issue- I have both P115 and P119. I bought new O2 sensors after my header install and both codes came up. I found a thread on another forum that said the resistance on the two heating wires should be between 1.8 and 2.5 ohms. My new ones were 3.4. The old ones were 2.5. I contacted the manufacturer (SNG) and they said my new ones were defective. I returned them but have not purchased another set yet.
Might be worth it to check the two white wires on both sides.
Good luck.

mn box s 04-25-2008 09:54 AM

I don't want to rule that out entirely, mine are Bosche exact replacements oem. I want to say that its probably not my problem. How do I go about testing the resistance I have a expensive fluke that willm do the trick. Was this from your rears or your fronts??? my guess is its from my rears that are not in any pipe currently??? Can anyone else chime in???

heyjae 04-25-2008 12:49 PM

P1115 is the pre-cat, passenger side sensor. The fluke will work in testing resistance. O2 sensor heating code issues seem to be popular. I'm trying resolve mine too.

Jaxonalden 04-25-2008 03:28 PM

O2 Sensors
 
This is just my opinion. To do their job, your O2 sensors need to read the O2 levels. The sensors are different before and after the cats because the resistance will be different when reading the exhaust gases because of the temp of the re-burning of the hydrocarbons. That re-burning confirms (through the O2 sensor) that the engines computer has the correct air/fuel ratio for the current conditions. When the oxygen sensor fails (or in your case removed and not reading the O2 in the exhaust), the computer can no longer sense the air/fuel ratio, so it ends up guessing. Your car performs poorly and uses more fuel than it needs to. It will also throw up a code to your computer saying "the O2 sensor is bad".
You wrote "The rear sensors I just plugged in and zip tied them up and out of the way". Those sensors aren't reading a thing! No wonder they threw a code.

mn box s 04-25-2008 07:37 PM

I realize. No cats here. Most people that run no cats will tie the rears up. I guess my next step is to weld in bungs for the 02 and try another set of cheaters on those. From what I have understood though was that the wide band 02s are the front ones and the closed loop 02s are the rears to double check whats going on in front of them. Thats why on other cars you can get away with tying them up.

Jaxonalden 04-27-2008 08:13 AM

I don't know the particulars about what parameter each O2 sensor monitors, but I do know that the ECU needs inputs. Those inputs include the O2 senors and if their transmitting bad info, or info out of tolerance, it will flag a code and the engine will not run efficiently.
I hope someday a computer nerd will develop some software that will allow the Boxster the use of running with no cats (off road use only officer ;) ). Sounds simple to me.

mn box s 04-28-2008 08:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jaxonalden
I don't know the particulars about what parameter each O2 sensor monitors, but I do know that the ECU needs inputs. Those inputs include the O2 senors and if their transmitting bad info, or info out of tolerance, it will flag a code and the engine will not run efficiently.
I hope someday a computer nerd will develop some software that will allow the Boxster the use of running with no cats (off road use only officer ;) ). Sounds simple to me.

So are there no computer flashes that can correct this problem?

SilentThunder 04-28-2008 08:29 PM

Ya, its called the european tune. Just flash it with a ROW computer and it doesn't read the cats. An australian member runs catless because of this IIRC

mn box s 04-28-2008 08:52 PM

I've been around here for awhile and seen the abbreviation ROW before... what is it?
How do I go about doing this flash tune? Can I change other parameters. Can I do the tune then chip the car? Suppose I have to send my ECU out :(

NickCats 04-29-2008 05:57 AM

ROW - Rest of the World ( outside of the US )

Nick

mn box s 04-29-2008 09:00 AM

Ok so do I drive around the world? Thanks about the ROW but seriously that doesn't help me thank you.

CJ_Boxster 04-29-2008 09:10 AM

As you already know that ROW stands for "Rest of the World"... to elaborate on this term for you, There are 2 types of boxsters... US spec Boxsters, and ROW boxsters.... US Spec boxsters have tighter Smog requirements and less aggressive/softer struts, springs & swaybars and settings than the ROW Boxsters.

Does that make sense, ROW Boxsters are sold EVERYWHERE but the USA.

blue2000s 04-29-2008 09:27 AM

You WANT the forward O2 sensors in the exhaust stream. This makes corrections in mixture during closed-loop operation. Don't use a cheater on these, use a normal bung.

For the rear sensors, if you can't get a reflash, you can replace the sensor with a circuit that tricks the ECU into thinking all is well. I've posted it here before if you're interested you should be able to search for it.

Jaxonalden 04-29-2008 07:28 PM

As you can see, we here in the US are the ones that are being restricted as to the true performance potential of the Boxster motor. The trick is to get the Euro tune on our Boxster's and then avoid the sniff check from your state. I'd love to get the flash on my '04 S but I don't know exactly how to go about it.

So I hope with the help of these posts you understand your problem a little better. I learn something new (trust though verified) from other Boxster owners. This is an invaluable website for help. Thanks y'all for your inputs.

We should all get together sometime. :cheers:

mn box s 04-29-2008 10:12 PM

Yes every thing makes sense... I still have the questions where do I get the reflash for ROW. Can I do the ROW and still chip my car...
I bought from the Mac guy today an obd2 code reader and eraser just to keep in the glove box so I can clear my exhaust codes. :barf:

jackhoff 04-30-2008 05:04 AM

^^ do you have any advice on who would be able to flash it with the ROW software? I mean the dealer (i have a good relationship with), would they be able to get the ROW software, or do they just have access to the US software?

tholyoak 04-30-2008 05:42 AM

All the maps are in the PST2/PIWIS, anybody (like myself) who has these tools can reflash the DME as long as the DME code is provided. I doubt a dealer will do it for you, as it is not legal for street use to run the ROW program here in the US.

You don't 'chip' these cars, they are reflashed with new maps by aftermarket tuners the same way the different factory maps are flashed, through the OBD port. Thus if you put an aftermarket 'chip' in there, it will overwrite your ROW map. Thus you would need a 'performance' map that also ignores the after cat O2 input.

-Todd

blinkwatt 04-30-2008 10:52 AM

Has anyone had their car dynoed after converting it to RoW spec?(Preferably a 3.2L)

tholyoak 04-30-2008 01:23 PM

As I stated in my PM, there is no performance gain by converting to the ROW program.

-Todd

CJ_Boxster 04-30-2008 01:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tholyoak
As I stated in my PM, there is no performance gain by converting to the ROW program.

-Todd


Todd, what differences are there from US spec ECu to a ROW ecu? would you happen to know all the differences?

tholyoak 04-30-2008 01:34 PM

There are actually a few 'ROW' programs, but I assume the one you are interested in, is the one that doesn't use post cat sensors. This obviously only use pre-cat sensors to control the mixture, ignores the need to depress the clutch to start the car, doesn't use the air pump for cold starts. Also it is virtually impossible to get a CEL as the tolerances are much greater on the ROW program. Those are the differences off the top of my head.

In earlier Porsches, the engines were higher compression and used higher octane in europe and thus used a more aggressive map (timing) than the USA/Canada program. Therefore a performance advantage was gained. This is no longer true, at least on the Boxster.

-Todd

CJ_Boxster 04-30-2008 01:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tholyoak
There are actually a few 'ROW' programs, but I assume the one you are interested in, is the one that doesn't use post cat sensors. This obviously only use pre-cat sensors to control the mixture, ignores the need to depress the clutch to start the car, doesn't use the air pump for cold starts. Also it is virtually impossible to get a CEL as the tolerances are much greater on the ROW program. Those are the differences off the top of my head.

In earlier Porsches, the engines were higher compression and used higher octane in europe and thus used a more aggressive map (timing) than the USA/Canada program. Therefore a performance advantage was gained. This is no longer true, at least on the Boxster.

-Todd

I see, thanks for the info Todd!

Topless 04-30-2008 01:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mn box s
I realize. No cats here. Most people that run no cats will tie the rears up. I guess my next step is to weld in bungs for the 02 and try another set of cheaters on those. From what I have understood though was that the wide band 02s are the front ones and the closed loop 02s are the rears to double check whats going on in front of them. Thats why on other cars you can get away with tying them up.

Or... You could put the cats back on, the o2 sensors back in and drive a smog legal car that runs great and has no error codes. Just a thought.

CJ_Boxster 04-30-2008 02:04 PM

I found a guy that can do the flash here in So cal. PM me if you want contact info.

mn box s 05-01-2008 04:38 AM

Well I found that GIAC won't delete the cats but I have tracked down someone from Motronic that said they can set the car up with a race program that does delete the 02s and will give some performance gains at least to accommodate my upgrades and program set up for nitrous. He will probably getting back to me today. Ill update you on what he has to say.

blue2000s 05-01-2008 06:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mn box s
Well I found that GIAC won't delete the cats but I have tracked down someone from Motronic that said they can set the car up with a race program that does delete the 02s and will give some performance gains at least to accommodate my upgrades and program set up for nitrous. He will probably getting back to me today. Ill update you on what he has to say.

I'm going to predict that it will be cheaper just to put the cats back on than that ECU reflash.

mn box s 05-01-2008 04:38 PM

Ok enough already! I'm not a quitter nor am I a stand by and watch my mechanic kind of guy. I'm on this forum to get advise/ help with the 3.2L Boxster as I've only owned one so far and haven't even had to take the motor out yet. There are however many on this site that have. YES it WOULD be easier to put the cats back on YES it would be CHEAPER too. I don't give a poop about that. I am interested in making more power out of what little room we all have to play with. If I have to be the pioneer that figures things out so be it. Where the hell would you be with out people like me anyway? If you don't want to help a fellow Box owner figure out a different way, fine, but don't post the obvious just to get in your .02. To the rest of you that are actually helping thank you very much!

Topless 05-01-2008 07:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mn box s
Ok enough already! I'm not a quitter nor am I a stand by and watch my mechanic kind of guy. I'm on this forum to get advise/ help with the 3.2L Boxster as I've only owned one so far and haven't even had to take the motor out yet. There are however many on this site that have. YES it WOULD be easier to put the cats back on YES it would be CHEAPER too. I don't give a poop about that. I am interested in making more power out of what little room we all have to play with. If I have to be the pioneer that figures things out so be it. Where the hell would you be with out people like me anyway? If you don't want to help a fellow Box owner figure out a different way, fine, but don't post the obvious just to get in your .02. To the rest of you that are actually helping thank you very much!

Then you will need o2 sensors in place and working or your ECU won't know what to do. Without o2 sensors your car will go into limp mode and run lousy. Throw away the cheaters and ask edevelin how he resolved this issue. I think it took several months of trial and error but he did get it resolved. Good luck.

No reason to get hostile here. Everyone has a right to have an opinion even if it is different than yours. Others will surely read this thread and find interest in both views. Maybe we can all learn something about these cars.

edevlin 05-02-2008 05:24 AM

"Throw away the cheaters and ask edevelin how he resolved this issue. I think it took several months of trial and error but he did get it resolved. Good luck."

Try six months or so. I started out with a stock 2.7L Boxster and first put in a cold air intake and an Autothority chip and and the car was running great, no cel's. I decided to add headers and 100-cell cats and 4 new factory oxygen sensors to the car, and that is when the CEL's started up.

We played with extending the cables to the rear oxygen sensors, moved the sensors deeper into and out of the exhasut stream, moved sensor bungs along the exhaust stream, and more.

Ended up replacing 3 of the new oxygen sensors, both cats and as a final measure slightly reprogramming the threshold for triggering the oxygen sensor CEL in the ECU. The whole time the car was running great, it just kept giving CEL's. Even after all the hassle and expense, I still marvel at these engines, my little 2.7L just humms and last week it put out 210 hp to the wheels with 100-octane fuel, great fun

Ed

:dance:

blue2000s 05-02-2008 05:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mn box s
Ok enough already! I'm not a quitter nor am I a stand by and watch my mechanic kind of guy. I'm on this forum to get advise/ help with the 3.2L Boxster as I've only owned one so far and haven't even had to take the motor out yet. There are however many on this site that have. YES it WOULD be easier to put the cats back on YES it would be CHEAPER too. I don't give a poop about that. I am interested in making more power out of what little room we all have to play with. If I have to be the pioneer that figures things out so be it. Where the hell would you be with out people like me anyway? If you don't want to help a fellow Box owner figure out a different way, fine, but don't post the obvious just to get in your .02. To the rest of you that are actually helping thank you very much!

Pioneer, good one. Maybe you should calm down a little.

mn box s 05-02-2008 06:29 AM

calm here, not trying to be a dick, another .02 I see blue2000s...

Any way thanks edevlin I also tried extending my 02s and putting them farther down the pipes. So you are saying put the 02s back in the stream up front? Edevlin did you have a wandering idle?

I would also like to add to the people who don't seem to understand why so much work to stay this way. I have absolutely NO resonance at ANY rpm! also can barley here the exhaust with the windows up unless really on it.(hard top) From out side though it is a beast, plain and simple. One last thing it makes whopping power over having cats. I have not dynoed yet but by seat of pants and runs against a testing car gave me 4 car lengths 60-100 mph. I will say I'd bet I might have lost a little bottom end before 4k rpm.

Testing car 03' M3 with exhaust. Before the exhaust and intake he dissapeared into the horizon. After intake, and exhaust (M3 was in sight!) headers (8 car lenthes!) test pipes and no cats ( 3-4 car lengths back and locked up!) I'm hoping after re-programming that I'm even. Who here can take an M3 with exhaust? What have you done? Sorry about the long post.

tholyoak 05-02-2008 06:44 AM

Sorry to disagree but you are not gaining any performance going with no cats vs welding in some good 100 or 200 cell sport cats into those test pipes. Alternatively you could just buy some Dansk sport cats to replace the test pipes. I use these on 3.4 conversions. Either one of these will solve all of your ECU issues, not reduce performance and be more socially responsible by reducing the emission levels from your car.

-Todd

blue2000s 05-02-2008 07:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mn box s
calm here, not trying to be a dick, another .02 I see blue2000s...

You make a comment towards me, I respond, that's the way it works.

mn box s 05-02-2008 07:36 AM

tholyoak do you do just a pair of these cats? what do you do with the rear 02s? How does more restriction gain power on top end of power band? If you have good luck with this set up I am interested but still don't see how it would make more power than w/o.

Blue2000s wanna race? or park your car next to mine at a car show? thats what I thought. No more comments from me directed at you. If you have more than .02 towards this post I'll oblige. ;)

edevlin 05-02-2008 07:37 AM

"Edevlin did you have a wandering idle?"

I never had a problem with a wandering idle, the car was running fine. We really dont know what the problem was in my setup. We actually tried several different versions of the ECU tune to try to dial it in for the 2000 2.7L Boxster with modified intake and exhaust systems.

I could have gotten bad cats or bad sensors. It could have been that I was running too rich on one of the earlier programs and buggered up the sensors and cats, could have been a problem with extending the wire or the locations of the bungs, who knows.

The ECU tune I ended up with is really sweet. As you can see from the graph I posted earlier, the torque curve is very, very flat, quite noticable behind the wheel. The tune was optimized not for max hp, but for responsiveness.

Ed

:cheers:

mn box s 05-02-2008 07:47 AM

Just got off the phone from ?protomotors? ecu reflash, durametric cable, softtronic software can pull diffrent tunes depending on if running nitrous or not. The price for the original reflash for evo intake, headers, no cats, and exhaust. With mild performance gains and no cel issues. $995.

Can anyone respond to this?

Additional re tunes run $695 which comes with the cables to download myself after program has been tweaked.

Topless 05-02-2008 08:02 AM

Ed has shown us that you can get a modest, reliable power increase with headers, intake and a careful ECU remap tune designed for his car. It can also go the other way. Here is a guy with Che headers and jury rigged o2 sensors on a 2001 S:
http://www.986forum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=15381

He had other issues as well but if the o2 sensors were in and working, and he paid attention to the CEL and error codes he would probably still be driving his car. I have not heard an update but I suspect his 3.2L motor is now a fine $8k German boat anchor. Be careful.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:45 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website