![]() |
Quote:
Hey Gary, I got the dope on that one and it has a term that evades me. But basically your compressing all the air from the TT to the throttle body. The more volume in tubes, IC, etc the longer it takes to compress and get the pressure where you want it. in short, more lag. Weather its noticeable or not, I guess it depends. (Think of blowing a bike tire up to 40 psi compared to blowing up a car tire to the same 40 psi, car tire more volume, more time to get there.) Regards, PK |
Quote:
I wonder if a suitabley sized exchanger could fit in the "S" radiator space. Regards, Pk |
Hi Guys, Just to make up to date on my project. I own a Boxster S 2000 with 32000 miles on it. Last year I added Supercharger, catback, headers, ecu reflash by IA, Bigger injectors, air intake, lowered suspension, Put aerokit and full carbon trunk lid after spoiler and brake light, hard top, porsche seats with carbon shell, Kinesis wheels, Short shifter, carbon console,
This winter I am addind intercooler in trunk with fan onto lid, nitro sprayed on intercooler and progressive water methanol injection just prior to trottle body to refresh engine some more to higher psi. So,With these upgrades I will put smaller pulley on supercharger to get almost 7 psi at trottle body. I hope I will dyno it around 375 whp. I do street and quarter mile drag with it in a team with my sons. They have a S2000 and a STI. Huge feeling. Add comments or recommendations please. I would like to send you pictures, but I need somebody of you to tell me how to insert in posts. I am not a pro with computer use. I appreciate you guys with all infos contained in forums Jacques One more thing, for those that are afraid to remove soft top, only 3 grouped bolts on each side and lift up. 10 minutes. Just have to pop off the two short red wires Have a good time |
Drag racing a Boxster. Now I've heard everything, haha:)
Start a thread about your Boxster and post pics, dyno, and later...drag slips! Love to see how it fares. -David |
well i don't have enough knowledge to get technical on this topic...but how do u think a front mount intercooler would work on a turbo boxster? just thought it'd look great behind a nice front bumper like fiberwerks' mulsanne.
|
Quote:
|
There is always this radiator kit sold by EAGLE DAY. It goes in the center behind the front bumper also as an add-on.
http://eagleday.stores.yahoo.net/bope.html http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y15...78_6514102.jpg :cheers: This radiator kit is stock for the GT3R race car and will bolt directly to the street car. Kit includes radiator, hoses, brackets, rubber grommets, air duct to match your bumper (stock, aero, or GT3R) and all necessary hardware. Professional installation recommended. The water-cooled modern Porsches have the radiator split into two sections, one in front of each front wheel. On certain models that require additional cooling, a third radiator is located in the center of the front bumper. In particular, a 986 Boxster equipped with the Tiptronic automatic transmission, a 986 Boxster S, and a 996 911, have center radiators. However, the 986 Boxster with manual transmission and 987 Boxster and Boxster S do not have a center radiator. But the space for the center radiator is available behind the bumper, and the mounting points are there, too. |
Just put the intercooler where it belongs on a Boxster....
Underneath it!! In the center goes the extra driving lights!! :cheers: |
Quote:
|
I did not take anything personal in what was said I was trying to be funny.
I think a front mount radiator looks great on our cars. If I ever do a larger engine I will go with a front mount radiator. Yes the lights are cut off a little on the top but was tough to find small enough quality lights that fit in the area. The good thing about the lights is unless you are looking for them you can not even see them when they are off. Really, the other post was my attempt to be funny...I guess my dry humor does not relate of the web. :cheers: |
Quote:
I’ve been posting here there and over there regarding upping the hp on my TPC, Eaton m63, 4.5 P.S.I. set up on my 99 2.5L Box.. As I recall you always had pretty solid horse sense, knowledge & experience …So I’m picking on you Somewhere I think it was you who said the bottom end of a 2.fL could handle 350 hp or more. It’s my understanding (anecdotally) that most people who overboost these things that blow their motors do so as a result of insufficient cooling at the top end…detonation. (My current analogue AIC cools by running rich and has no timing. Replacement will be programmable for both fuel and timing. I think it will also sport a 750cc/min 7th injector instead of the current 500cc/min (TCP’s current upgrade)) I’ve been doing tons of homework and figure with WI, progressive or better, 270cc/min nozzle, 100/150 psi pump, 20-30% meth., injected right by the opening of “spider” manifold would do it for the cooling (no?) Pulleying down from 2.6 dia. to 2.5 would put me at about 288 hp (from 260 approx). with the super operating in it safe rpm, zone (14k rpm’s). A 2.4 pulley would put me at about 300hp. But my super would be at 15.3k rpm’s (in a 14k-16k- iffy zone). Only issue I can see is diminishing returns, the super taking more hp than it can contribute at high revs. What do you think about my plan? Regards, PK P.S. I picked up a EGT (exhaust gas temp) guage an sensord and a wideband |
Quote:
Eric |
Quote:
Eric |
pk2 wrote:
Somewhere I think it was you who said the bottom end of a 2.fL could handle 350 hp or more. It’s my understanding (anecdotally) that most people who overboost these things that blow their motors do so as a result of insufficient cooling at the top end…detonation. Hi Peter, My ~350 number is only a guess, based on experience with Audi and VW bottom ends (80-100 HP per hole, before rods bend), but none with Porsche's. I'm assuming that Porsche builds solid cranks and rods like their friends across town. I would concur, most broken forced induction motors happen due to detonation, which might cascade into pre-ignition or maybe just break stuff directly. I’ve been doing tons of homework and figure with WI, progressive or better, 270cc/min nozzle, 100/150 psi pump, 20-30% meth., injected right by the opening of “spider” manifold would do it for the cooling (no?) Yes, water/methanol injection will do a good job of cooling, with or without an additional intercooler. This alone can net some significant HP (go play with my turbo calculator for any generic engine and just add a bit of water injection to see how density increases -> HP increases). http://www.not2fast.com/turbo/glossary/turbo_calc.shtml (Also read the caveats on the math I use to model the water injection so you don't get too optimistic: http://www.not2fast.com/thermo/water_injection/opt_mass.shtml) Pulleying down from 2.6 dia. to 2.5 would put me at about 288 hp (from 260 approx). with the super operating in it safe rpm, zone (14k rpm’s). A 2.4 pulley would put me at about 300hp. But my super would be at 15.3k rpm’s (in a 14k-16k- iffy zone). Only issue I can see is diminishing returns, the super taking more hp than it can contribute at high revs. You need to worry about loss of efficiency with higher revs, too. Here's a graph of the older, much less efficent M62 (the Eaton guys were going to send me newer maps, but I never followed through with them, oops) showing temperature change as a function of charger speed, and you can see it is not linear, but increasing faster than the speed does. At some point, the compressor efficiency is such that spinning it faster merely makes the charge hotter and nothing else, so at that point you are way beyond diminishing returns. http://www.not2fast.com/turbo/maps/M62deltaT.gif P.S. I picked up a EGT (exhaust gas temp) guage an sensord and a wideband More data is always good, do you have a way to datalog the EGT and lambda along with some other engine parameters (RPM, throttle position and that sort of thing)? Analyzing logs is so much easier than trying to look at gauges while you're driving (but then, if you make a video of all the gauges, you can do a fair amount of "log analysis" that way). Eric |
Quote:
What are your plans for mounting the gauges and what brand did you go with? I am in the process of narrowing my gauge options so I started a gauge thread at http://986forum.com/forums/performance-technical-chat/15116-aftermarket-gauges-data-logging-post133322.html#post133322 Gary |
Quote:
I am really glad to hear that!! Even though it may not appear this way But I am trying to keep my ar as simple as possible. What do you think the reason Porsche added the 3rd radiator on other models? |
Quote:
Probably for track use? Blasting across the desert at part throttle with lots of air going through the radiators probably isn't too stressful for the cooling system. Go to a driving event at Sebring or Willow Springs on a hot day and you probably need that third radiator and then some... Eric |
Quote:
Please send m a link or pics of this trunk and intercooler setup. i would also like to find out who did the nitro and metonal injection to the car for you. I have the first IA SC kit on my 2000 S and since have become a boost junkie. Also how long have you had the SC system? Any new and strange oil leaks? |
Quote:
You won believe this story and time will tell…I’m out to grab another 20-30hp and wind with Phd in tuning components. As to mounting, I’m a product designer (me make pretty), I’ll come up with something. The short answer is everything can show up on my laptop is I want, or on gauges if I want. Goal is to avoid it looking like a Pacchinco machine. If its gauges, the center shelves go b-bye. Ergonomically, up the “A” pillar is the best for a quick glance. Also a cop magnetthough. But I’m not sure I want the glaring al the time. Once it’s set, unless something goes bump… For My O2 setup I’m relying on a JAW. That’s a brainchild (among others) of a tuning wiz named Alan Tu in Canada. He’s engineered a DYI W/B getup running off a standard Bosch LSU W/B O2 sensor and output to a back-lit digital readout (I think it will drive a traditional gauge to). Plugs into your laptop and (O.S.) software & lets you do more than you want. It also will log 2 additional, standard 5v inputsIn addition, compute maps for two, 0- 5v outputs from the A/F data. (5v is pretty much what all the ECU stuff runs at). He sells them complete with software in 2 forms, Bag o parts with directions or assembled, $70 & $90 respectively. Throw in the $60 Bosch LSU W/B O2 sensor (Amazon) and your looking at $130-$150 and some finger grease…an ‘elluva platform. Want more? It gets better:.. My EGT (exhaust gas temp) in it’s current form is a used Alcor. It’s a 2 sensor variety. I plan on putting one sensor on each header. Who’s Alchor? They’ve been building these things since WWII…for airplanes, Normal, supers, & turbos, Turns out the vast majority of EGT setups (planes, trains, & autos) use the same method. At their core is a Type “K” probe, all are the same physically, functionally in there output. Difference is the durability. The Alcor is designed for aircraft, one elluva lot more durable (surprise). Ebay; bad add, misspelling; $27 To the “k” type EGT sensors I can also add a $35 “amplifier” and feed the amped probe data into the JAW for readout on the laptop (along with the AFR and whatever else I plug into it) & log the data. So for $217 I get EGT, W/B o2, software for readouts, logging & ,manipulation plus 2 gauges, one digital and on analogue. In another window I will have my SS R4 software running to tune my AIC, timing & WI. Oh yea.. another $50 for a smaller SC pulley to get the SC spinning.. Sleepy yet? Regards, PK P.S. JAW stands for “Just Another Wideband” Go here for JAW http://14point7.com/ |
Quote:
Thanks much PK |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:59 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website