986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners

986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners (http://986forum.com/forums/)
-   Performance and Technical Chat (http://986forum.com/forums/performance-technical-chat/)
-   -   Motor Oil for 1997 Boxster (http://986forum.com/forums/performance-technical-chat/10239-motor-oil-1997-boxster.html)

tluckett 03-23-2007 05:02 PM

Motor Oil for 1997 Boxster
 
Can anyone tell me what motor oil I should use for a 1997 Boxster?

986 Girl 03-23-2007 07:05 PM

It's dependant really on the average temperatures your car is going to see.

You can read more about the different weights and such here:

http://www.986faq.com/2-0/default.asp#011

DrRoentgen 03-27-2007 02:11 PM

Hey, newby to this BB, I was told 0-40 Mobil one is the way to go. Apparently the lubricant also has to do with the proper function of the variocam, so selection is important...

Brucelee 03-27-2007 02:47 PM

Your car was originally shipped with M1 15W-50.

You can also use M1 0W-40 are its equiv.

DrRoentgen 03-27-2007 03:02 PM

Bruce, I read in an Excellence post that the variocam is effected by the oil choice, do you know if that is true?

Brucelee 03-27-2007 04:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DrRoentgen
Bruce, I read in an Excellence post that the variocam is effected by the oil choice, do you know if that is true?


I have heard that and it is conceivable. I don't think any quality synthetic that meets Porsche spec will be an issue.

One thing to note is that the current M1 15W-50 is NOT the same formula that was specd out in 1997. The current version is rumored to be a "make believe syn" rather than a PAO syn.

When all is said and done, I would go with the M1 0W-40, which is apparently still a PAO syn.

Safe vs sorry.

Hope that helps.

:)

DrRoentgen 03-28-2007 06:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brucelee
I have heard that and it is conceivable. I don't think any quality synthetic that meets Porsche spec will be an issue.

One thing to note is that the current M1 15W-50 is NOT the same formula that was specd out in 1997. The current version is rumored to be a "make believe syn" rather than a PAO syn.

When all is said and done, I would go with the M1 0W-40, which is apparently still a PAO syn.

Safe vs sorry.

Hope that helps.

:)


Thank you, it helps a lot, that is what I'm running now.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:23 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website