![]() |
Quote:
it also introduces air under the car. once you have air under the car then you get bernoilli effect (the air traveling over the car and under the car have to get to the back at the same time - the air traveling over the car has to travel a curve vs the straight line under the car so has a longer distance to go - as a result it has to accelerate - this creates a pressure differential between the top and bottom of the car that lifts the car). this lift gets reduced by putting an air dam on the back that disrupts the airflow over the car. caymans have a more aggressive front spoiler and no third radiator so less air under the car, they don't need an air dam and get a wing to create down force instead. so, really, aero should be done as a package, but given how jacked-up the front airflow is on our cars, I don't think a rear air dam vs wing is going to be a deciding factor in losing control at hwy speeds. |
at least you got it right that an air dam does not create downforce, but reduces lift
I would bet that Porsche did a fair bit of wind tunnel testing, so they probably do know what they were doing and have at very least a fair bit of aero design knowledge Throwing some piece of fiberglass on the back of the car without any actual aero testing is at best dumb and at worst dangerous does the caymen "wing" look better, IMHO, yes. The problem is the aero of the car is different and as you stated, aero needs to be a full car integration, not just adding a piece here or there. I guess it depends on what you are trying to gain, looks or performance |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:04 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website