Go Back   986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners > Porsche Boxster & Cayman Forums > Boxster General Discussions

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 09-05-2007, 09:32 PM   #30
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota, USA
Posts: 3,308
Quote:
Originally Posted by boxsterz
WOW. I am astounded.

How in the world did you miss the 7.6% Molybdenum??

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sodium_molybdate ?
It' in BOTH the WW and the jelly.
Onward to the truth!!!!

Hi,

It is? It seems to me that Water Wetter's MSDS states that it contains Sodium Molybdate, an inorganic salt made up of 2 atoms of Sodium, one atom of Molybdenum and 4 atoms of Oxygen in it's anhydrous state (add .2H²O for it's dihydrous state) = Na2MoO4 or Na2MoO4 . H²O, rather than pure molybdenum (Mo).

If the alleged resultant gel was the product of the breakdown of this molecular compound, the % of molybdenum would be considerably lower since molybdenum makes up only 14% of this compound which constitutes only 2-10% of Water Wetter - we wou7ld expect amounts in the 1%-1.7% range . If there is more in the Spectral analysis, where did it come from? You cannot point only to the mere presence of Molybdenum and say "There you go..." - you need to validate the amount, especially if the analysis shows a greater quantity than is possible from your suspect additive. Where did all this excess Mo come from?

The Sodium (Na) (28% of the compound) is absent unless you want to make the case that it was transformed into Sodium Bicarbonate (Natrium - CAS# 144-55-8) if you can explain the process to me whereby the Sodium is not only released from the Na2MoO4, but also found the necessary Free Oxygen and Free Hydrogen to bond with.

Then, there is the presence of the other element - Potassium (Ka). It is present in a disturbingly large amount given the chemical makeup of your suspect substance - Water Wetter, which contains NONE - NADA, RIEN, NICHTS, ZILCH! Are you planning on totally ignoring this because it doesn't agree with your belief?

I am steadfast in my belief that you have inferred much, but proven nothing on your quest for Truth (at least the Truth as you see it).

FYI, I have emailed Red Line's Technical Department a 2nd time to repeat my initial request, but also fowarded an attached copy of the Spectral analysis as well. Hopefully they will respond shortly and put this to rest...

Happy Motoring!... Jim'99
MNBoxster is offline  
 



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:14 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page