01-26-2015, 02:16 AM
|
#1
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Prague
Posts: 12
|
Difference between m96.21 and m96.24
Hi All,
does anyone know the differences between the engines and m96.21 m96.24.
M96.21 - Boxster S 1999-2002
M96.24 - Boxster S 2003-2004
Thank you, Martin.
Last edited by Sm33C; 01-26-2015 at 02:37 AM.
|
|
|
01-26-2015, 02:43 AM
|
#2
|
Beginner
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,659
|
5 chain versus 3 chain.
__________________
2003 S manual
|
|
|
01-26-2015, 06:25 AM
|
#3
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Agoura Hills (LA) So.Cal.
Posts: 1,574
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jamesp
5 chain versus 3 chain.
|
Do the earlier cars have the 5 chains? What are the advantages or disadvantages of the different set ups? TIA
__________________
1995 Porsche C4 Cab
2016 BMW M2, 6 Speed LBB - ED 7/2016
1997 993 Cab - Sold; 1997 993 Turbo - Sold
2001 Boxster S - Original Owner - 30K Miles -SOLD
|
|
|
01-26-2015, 06:39 AM
|
#4
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Midwest
Posts: 1,746
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chuck W.
Do the earlier cars have the 5 chains? What are the advantages or disadvantages of the different set ups? TIA
|
IIRC, 5 chain motors through 2002, 3 chain motors 2003 and on. Only advantage / disadvantage that I know of is that the later 3 chain motors were more susceptible to jumping time during an IMS Bearing change. Someone smarter than I will likely have more info.
|
|
|
01-26-2015, 06:41 AM
|
#5
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Prague
Posts: 12
|
Sorry for the stupid question ... But what do you mean chain? What the chain?
I would like to raise the performance and the first thing that occurred to me is to see the differences between versions, becouse mine has 185 kilowatts and 196 kilowatts after the facelift ...
|
|
|
01-26-2015, 07:07 AM
|
#6
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: O.C. CA
Posts: 3,709
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by coreseller
IIRC, 5 chain motors through 2002, 3 chain motors 2003 and on. Only advantage / disadvantage that I know of is that the later 3 chain motors were more susceptible to jumping time during an IMS Bearing change. Someone smarter than I will likely have more info.
|
That's because eliminating the 2 individual cam to cam chains forces the 2 IMS to cam chains to be longer. This inherently causes more opportunity for slack from the chain.
__________________
OE engine rebuilt,3.6 litre LN Engineering billet sleeves,triple row IMSB,LN rods. Deep sump oil pan with DT40 oil.
|
|
|
01-26-2015, 07:24 AM
|
#7
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: O.C. CA
Posts: 3,709
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sm33C
Hi All,
does anyone know the differences between the engines and m96.21 m96.24.
M96.21 - Boxster S 1999-2002
M96.24 - Boxster S 2003-2004
Thank you, Martin.
|
Main difference is the VarioCam timing adjustment difference. 2000-2002MY changes cam timing 13 degrees in one abrupt step, this occurs between 2,200-2500rpm via a 7.2 DME.
M96.24 VarioCam has a infinitely variable cam adjustment ranging 40 degrees of crankshaft rotation. This requires the more advanced 7.8 DME. This engine has the slightly improved AOS & crankshaft pressure reduction notches at the bottom of the cylinders.
__________________
OE engine rebuilt,3.6 litre LN Engineering billet sleeves,triple row IMSB,LN rods. Deep sump oil pan with DT40 oil.
|
|
|
01-26-2015, 07:26 AM
|
#8
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Prague
Posts: 12
|
Thank you!!!
|
|
|
01-26-2015, 07:42 AM
|
#9
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,128
|
except ... they didn't put the variocam + on the boxster until 2007? ie, it got the 7.8 dme, and it got the 3 chain, but it didn't get the new heads.
|
|
|
01-26-2015, 07:51 AM
|
#10
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: O.C. CA
Posts: 3,709
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Radium King
except ... they didn't put the variocam + on the boxster until 2007? ie, it got the 7.8 dme, and it got the 3 chain, but it didn't get the new heads.
|
When Porsche introduced the 2002 996 & the 2003 Boxsters they called the new engines VarioCam plus to highlight the improvements in Cam timing.
__________________
OE engine rebuilt,3.6 litre LN Engineering billet sleeves,triple row IMSB,LN rods. Deep sump oil pan with DT40 oil.
|
|
|
01-26-2015, 08:40 AM
|
#11
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,128
|
I guess my point is that the 3.2 engines didn't get variocam +, just the 3.4 (boxster/cayman) and 3.6 (996). the boxster didn't get the 3.4 until 2007.
|
|
|
01-26-2015, 08:55 AM
|
#12
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,128
|
I think the jump in hp from 252 to 276 between the 986 and 987 3.2L is mostly tune, exhaust and intake. makes sense if you look at the hp/displacement ratio of a 3.4L 996 engine pre-variocam + (296/3.4 = 87); applying this same factor to a 3.2L engine gets you 279 hp - they starved the 3.2 originally, and only gave it more power once they started putting bigger engines in the 911 series (imagine a 280 hp boxster s when the 3.4 996 was only making 296 hp?!?!?).
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:13 AM.
| |