I think the only down fall for the new car is its high price . The dealer near me has had one S model on the lot for about a month. not going to sell in volume like the old 986.

if porsche decides to make a light weight version of the new car i'm sure it will surpass the 987 spyder easily (hopefully with a better roof)
.

Sure it will, I don't know about easily but time marches forward. They will keep tweaking the HP and weight to make sure every new buyer has performance bragging rights and to keep their competition at bay.

However, for now speaking for myself I'm even more convinced I made the right choice. As for the roof, it's just fine maybe a touch more noisy but it is purposeful. Either you embrace the spirit of the car or not, it's not for everyone to say the least. I've had it on three times all summer so I'll take the weight savings and total lack of all that mechanized linkage that causes fits as the cars age; I also think it will last longer (always out of the sun) and will be so easy to duplicate any boat canvass maker worth their salt could make you a better than OEM version.

All the reviews I've read are underwhelming on the electronic steering. The engineers make a very good argument for it, safer (no highly flamable fluids anymore), doesn't divert HP, saves gas at stop lights, etc. but it still means that the 987 Boxster Spyder will always be the best handling Boxster from a driver's perspective.

The new Boxster front end looks the best of any Porsche sold today (imho). But the doors still look really gimmicky to me and the cruise ship captain's cockpit is totally out place for a roadster. I can see it working in Panamera or Carrera (cars for fat cats).

one drive in that cruise ship cockpit and you will get a real sense of how old and outdated the 986 is. their is nothing wrong with some luxury in a sports car. let's face it 99% of us use the car on public roads . I actually find the 986 steering to be annoying at times with all its "feel" . their are things you want to feel and things you don't. Porsche knows this and has been dialing out all the annoying stuff with each model update. I think I would prefer the new steering.

The new steering has less to do with "dialing in wheel feel" than it does meeting future mileage standards by reducing parasitic drag, all the manufacturers are heading that way.

Nobody has been talking about how the move to the new steering gear removes one of the more problematic areas of the car, for people that take their cars to the track.
Go to the Cayman board to see all the issues on how the PS unit fails or leaks at the track or what happens when that fluid gets dumped in a hot engine compartment. A fellow had his car burn at a DE when the fluid ignited. Not sure if it was a total loss but enough damage to put his car out of commission for a while. It may not happen to all tracked cars, it will definitely get your attention if it happens to you.
You may loose some of the steering feel with the new unit, but I think the others gains out way that negative.

LOL, there are other ways to combat a fluid line that runs too close to the exhaust manifold. It's hardly the right "fix" for that issue.

Glad you said it, that same basic system has been around a long while and has proved itself reliable over the interval.

I wonder how long it has been since many on the board have have driven a 2300 pound sports car with a manual steering rack. Window cranks, manual side view mirrors and -gasp- a live rear axle. It changes your perspective on what a car should feel like. It shouldn't be perfect, it should have character and personality. I am lucky to have this as my benchmark and the cars I drive are compared to it. I guess that's why every generation of Porsche that comes along keeps getting more and more dissapointing to me.

Hmmm, blue2000s, if I was a betting man I'd say your next car is leaning in the Exige direction rather than F355. :)

I am still resisting the temptation to put 18s or wider 17s and more negative camber on "your" car. I am also resisting the temptation to put R compound rubber on it ... not that the tires on it are anywhere near worn out yet, in spite of my higher rate of mileage accumulation. It drives so nice now, I keep reminding myself that it's not broken, so don't F#$@ with it.

You can help with this by asking me periodically how the Miata is coming. :)

For me one week only it's 2100 pounds

Blue, in all seriousness, why don't you look into a vintage car? It's sounds like it would much better match your desires.

Can you imagine what would happen in the media if Porsche produced a modern car with the "character" (flaws) you desire? They would be crucified. You can't turn back time, and unlearn technology.

I'll drive one at some point, but from what I've read, the slight numbness doesn't detract from the driving pleasure. It should also free up some H.P. , though it is a shame to lose some feedback.

Both vehicles have their charms but Stephen makes an excellent point. I can only drive mine a couple miles as the lack of independent suspension in the rear is a lumbar disk pulverizer. It's also a PIA because people in NY all want to go warp nine at the green and stop in eighty feet. Forty year old technology can't do that. I won't even mention what a death ship it would be if hit by one of ten texters you see every single trip in this country, LOL though, you pea brained driving maniacs!

There are a few true sports cars left on the market. If Porsche made one in addition to the GTs, they'd be applauded for getting back to basics. But I agree that they can't go back with the current models. It's too bad though that they are moving both cars in the same direction at the same pace. Like I've mentioned before, Porsche no longer makes any cars that interest me. The best ones have already been made.

Hey M - I never changed the wheels because I like the ride and handling better with the 17s. Plus 17s are cheaper for a very minimal performance increase if at all. Besides, I think once you have the Miata set up and you're using it, the urge will go away.

losing feedback is a mortal sin for THIS type of car. Fine for bloated GT or GT-lite or GT styled convertible. Engineering should revolve on avoiding that as much as possible. In fact they should engineer new ways to have MORE feedback.
How? Who knows that's why they rake in millions. It's not very imaginative to simply turn a sports car into a cushy, insulated plush yuppy mover. People are quick to point out that it's lighter, more powerful but it's pretty obvious that these things are driven by arriving at the lowest lap time (N-ring specifically) and not maximizing the driver's role.
But those are two incongruent objectives. Faster N-ring times mean the car must do more and the driver less -- certainly with more and more power that can put the average inexperienced , deep-pocketed driver up a tree with one errant move. So feedback becomes a secondary goal and you get less and less with each new generation. They are slowly destroying the key element of the roadster experience. It's like playing a video game on the easiet level because that's the one where you drive fastest and your mistakes never slow you down.

Blue those 2100 pound cars, have no six airbags, no six speaker stereos, no catalytic converters, no five mile an hour bumpers they can't build one at 2100 anymore, there are too many regulations and crash test metrics to meet.

I think in many ways I'm the type of guy Porsche is designing cars for. I'm in my 60's and I love cars as much as always, and can I afford a nicer car. I read all the reviews and lust over the best handling, most powerful model - even though I will probably never put it on a track. I know the 315 HP on the new Boxster S is completely wasted on me, but knowing it's there and being able to punch it occasionally may help to keep me young. The problem is that after a couple of hours driving in my 986 my back begins to ache a bit and the noise starts to get to me. Enter the 981 - quieter, plusher, luxury interior. Others understandably don't want that, but it works for me.

I apologize to everyone on the forum for being the demographic that drives these changes, but as a kid I had to walk 4 miles to school in 3' of snow....

They can build one at 1200 ... :-)

Caterham Cars