| 
        | 
 
 
	
	
		
	
	
	
		|  06-15-2007, 11:49 AM | #1 |  
	| Registered User 
				 
				Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: los angeles 
					Posts: 256
				      | 
			wouldn't that be IS instead of IMS? or is inter mediate 2 words now?i guess that's worse than IBS?
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  11-23-2007, 02:06 PM | #2 |  
	| Registered User 
				 
				Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Exeter UK 
					Posts: 8
				      | 
			http://www.autofarm.co.uk/engines/water_cooled/shaft_tech
Hi guys. My Boxster has suffered the same fate and Porsche dont give a damn they are only interested in money taken off owners like us. check out the link above for the cure, these guys are in the uk but my car is fixed by them and it is now cured f all IMS problems.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  11-24-2007, 06:27 AM | #3 |  
	| Registered User 
				 
				Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Montreal 
					Posts: 502
				      | 
			Hi, Now I'm confused, 
When a leaking RMS isn't fixed it could lead to an IMS failure right!!! and the culprit would be the RMS bearing gone bad and causing the IMS ( SHAFT) to spin off center causing the total engine meltdown or maybe the RMS oil leak was only from the 3 bolts holding the bearing housing in place and not cause any IMS failure at all. 
Did i get this right     or does the RMS seal and bearing have nothing to do with the IMS shaft failure, meaning that it fails on its own due to a bad design, what I'm trying to say is the IMS, the shaft being spun in place by the RMS bearing or are they not related at all and in different places in the engine.
 
I need another coffee     
				__________________1997 Porsche Boxster manual
 2018 Subaru WRX Sport Tech
 2014 Honda CRV
 2014 Mercedes Benz 350 ML
 2015 Chevrolet Corvette Stingray manual
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  11-24-2007, 07:22 AM | #4 |  
	| Registered User 
				 
				Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: Des Moines, IA 
					Posts: 8,083
				      | 
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Franco
					
				 Hi, Now I'm confused, 
When a leaking RMS isn't fixed it could lead to an IMS failure right!!! and the culprit would be the RMS bearing gone bad and causing the IMS ( SHAFT) to spin off center causing the total engine meltdown or maybe the RMS oil leak was only from the 3 bolts holding the bearing housing in place and not cause any IMS failure at all. 
Did i get this right     or does the RMS seal and bearing have nothing to do with the IMS shaft failure, meaning that it fails on its own due to a bad design, what I'm trying to say is the IMS, the shaft being spun in place by the RMS bearing or are they not related at all and in different places in the engine.
 
I need another coffee     |  
To my knowledge, there is not relationship between the two, except that both are design flaws that have not been fixed by porsche.
		 
				__________________ 
				Rich Belloff
    |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  11-24-2007, 09:54 AM | #5 |  
	| Registered User 
				 
				Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Montreal 
					Posts: 502
				      | 
			Hi, Thanks Bruce
 Let's pray to all the Gods :ah:
 
				__________________1997 Porsche Boxster manual
 2018 Subaru WRX Sport Tech
 2014 Honda CRV
 2014 Mercedes Benz 350 ML
 2015 Chevrolet Corvette Stingray manual
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  11-25-2007, 04:20 PM | #6 |  
	| Registered User 
				 
				Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Dallas, TX 
					Posts: 1,460
				      | 
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by humara
					
				 wouldn't that be IS instead of IMS? or is inter mediate 2 words now?i guess that's worse than IBS?
 |  
Yeah, and if we're getting into semantics, isn't "100M miles"  actually 100,000,000 miles? 
I'd say that's an "old" engine.  (I'd also say it's reliable.)
		 
				__________________.
1997 Honda Accord | V6
2004 BMW 330i | ZHP | SOLD
2000 Porsche Boxster | SOLD | http://www.986forum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=9114
http://www.kryzak.com/storage/986sig12.jpg
http://kryzak.tumblr.com |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  11-25-2007, 05:30 PM | #7 |  
	| Porsche "Purist" 
				 
				Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Wisconsin 
					Posts: 2,123
				      | 
			In accounting terms m = 1000,  mm = 1,000,000
		 
				__________________1998 Boxster with 7.8 DME, 2005 3.6 liter/325 hp, Variocam Plus, 996 Instrument panel
 2001 Boxster original owner.  I installed used motor at 89k.
 1987 924S.      2002 996TT.        PST-2
 Owned and repaired Porsches since 1974.  Porsche: It's not driving, it's therapy.
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  11-25-2007, 08:51 PM | #8 |  
	| Registered User 
				 
				Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Dallas, TX 
					Posts: 1,460
				      | 
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Paul
					
				 In accounting terms m = 1000,  mm = 1,000,000 |  
And in Roman Numerals, M = 1000, MM = 2000
 
However, accounting terms are generally associated with currency.  Furthermore, "m" could also be "meters" or "miles." All in all, an ambivalent abbreviation.
 
I like the commonly used "100k" which hopefully won't get confused with 100 kilometers .  And watch out for "100K" which would be 100 degrees Kelvin  <- And that would be a COLD  engine, not an OLD  one.
 
What a tricky world of grammar we live in!  
-I mean, "What a tricky world of grammar in which we live !"
		 
				__________________.
1997 Honda Accord | V6
2004 BMW 330i | ZHP | SOLD
2000 Porsche Boxster | SOLD | http://www.986forum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=9114
http://www.kryzak.com/storage/986sig12.jpg
http://kryzak.tumblr.com |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
	
	| 
	|  Posting Rules |  
	| 
		
		You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts 
 HTML code is On 
 |  |  |  All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:44 AM. 
	
	
		
	
	
 |  |