Go Back   986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners > Porsche Boxster & Cayman Forums > Boxster General Discussions

Post Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-15-2007, 11:49 AM   #1
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: los angeles
Posts: 256
wouldn't that be IS instead of IMS? or is inter mediate 2 words now?
i guess that's worse than IBS?
humara is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2007, 02:06 PM   #2
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Exeter UK
Posts: 8
http://www.autofarm.co.uk/engines/water_cooled/shaft_tech

Hi guys. My Boxster has suffered the same fate and Porsche dont give a damn they are only interested in money taken off owners like us. check out the link above for the cure, these guys are in the uk but my car is fixed by them and it is now cured f all IMS problems.
ikdavis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2007, 06:27 AM   #3
Registered User
 
Franco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Montreal
Posts: 502
Hi, Now I'm confused,

When a leaking RMS isn't fixed it could lead to an IMS failure right!!! and the culprit would be the RMS bearing gone bad and causing the IMS ( SHAFT) to spin off center causing the total engine meltdown or maybe the RMS oil leak was only from the 3 bolts holding the bearing housing in place and not cause any IMS failure at all.
Did i get this right or does the RMS seal and bearing have nothing to do with the IMS shaft failure, meaning that it fails on its own due to a bad design, what I'm trying to say is the IMS, the shaft being spun in place by the RMS bearing or are they not related at all and in different places in the engine.

I need another coffee
__________________
1997 Porsche Boxster manual
2018 Subaru WRX Sport Tech
2014 Honda CRV
2014 Mercedes Benz 350 ML
2015 Chevrolet Corvette Stingray manual
Franco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2007, 07:22 AM   #4
Registered User
 
Brucelee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 8,083
Quote:
Originally Posted by Franco
Hi, Now I'm confused,

When a leaking RMS isn't fixed it could lead to an IMS failure right!!! and the culprit would be the RMS bearing gone bad and causing the IMS ( SHAFT) to spin off center causing the total engine meltdown or maybe the RMS oil leak was only from the 3 bolts holding the bearing housing in place and not cause any IMS failure at all.
Did i get this right or does the RMS seal and bearing have nothing to do with the IMS shaft failure, meaning that it fails on its own due to a bad design, what I'm trying to say is the IMS, the shaft being spun in place by the RMS bearing or are they not related at all and in different places in the engine.

I need another coffee
To my knowledge, there is not relationship between the two, except that both are design flaws that have not been fixed by porsche.
__________________
Rich Belloff

Brucelee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2007, 09:54 AM   #5
Registered User
 
Franco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Montreal
Posts: 502
Hi, Thanks Bruce

Let's pray to all the Gods :ah:
__________________
1997 Porsche Boxster manual
2018 Subaru WRX Sport Tech
2014 Honda CRV
2014 Mercedes Benz 350 ML
2015 Chevrolet Corvette Stingray manual
Franco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2007, 04:20 PM   #6
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 1,460
Quote:
Originally Posted by humara
wouldn't that be IS instead of IMS? or is inter mediate 2 words now?
i guess that's worse than IBS?
Yeah, and if we're getting into semantics, isn't "100M miles" actually 100,000,000 miles?
I'd say that's an "old" engine. (I'd also say it's reliable.)
__________________
.
1997 Honda Accord | V6
2004 BMW 330i | ZHP | SOLD
2000 Porsche Boxster | SOLD | http://www.986forum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=9114

http://www.kryzak.com/storage/986sig12.jpg

http://kryzak.tumblr.com
Jeph is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2007, 05:30 PM   #7
Porsche "Purist"
 
Paul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 2,123
Garage
In accounting terms m = 1000, mm = 1,000,000
__________________
1998 Boxster with 7.8 DME, 2005 3.6 liter/325 hp, Variocam Plus, 996 Instrument panel
2001 Boxster original owner. I installed used motor at 89k.
1987 924S. 2002 996TT. PST-2
Owned and repaired Porsches since 1974. Porsche: It's not driving, it's therapy.
Paul is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2007, 08:51 PM   #8
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 1,460
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul
In accounting terms m = 1000, mm = 1,000,000
And in Roman Numerals, M = 1000, MM = 2000

However, accounting terms are generally associated with currency. Furthermore, "m" could also be "meters" or "miles." All in all, an ambivalent abbreviation.

I like the commonly used "100k" which hopefully won't get confused with 100 kilometers. And watch out for "100K" which would be 100 degrees Kelvin <- And that would be a COLD engine, not an OLD one.

What a tricky world of grammar we live in!
-I mean, "What a tricky world of grammar in which we live!"
__________________
.
1997 Honda Accord | V6
2004 BMW 330i | ZHP | SOLD
2000 Porsche Boxster | SOLD | http://www.986forum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=9114

http://www.kryzak.com/storage/986sig12.jpg

http://kryzak.tumblr.com
Jeph is offline   Reply With Quote
Post Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:16 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page